RE: MPLS implemention at backbone and client connect [7:28655]

Thank You Mr.Chris White and others regards jagan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29042&t=28655 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisc

Re: MPLS implemention at backbone and client connect [7:28655]

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, nrf wrote: > > I presume that you are speaking of L3 MPLS VPN's. Actually, Cisco L3 MPLS > VPN's (RFC 2547) do not behave like Frame-relay or ATM at all. The key > difference is that implementing RFC 2547 assumes IP connectivity at the > customer, whereas FR or ATM makes no

Re: MPLS implemention at backbone and client connect [7:28655]

Comments inline ""Chris White"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jagan Krishnaraj wrote: > > > One Telco service provider claims that they are using MPLS (Cisco Powered > > Network) at his back bone, which enable substantial saving to the cli

Re: MPLS implemention at backbone and client connect [7:28655]

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jagan Krishnaraj wrote: > One Telco service provider claims that they are using MPLS (Cisco Powered > Network) at his back bone, which enable substantial saving to the clients. > All the remote sites are able to connect to the central site via the service > provider's MPLS cl

MPLS implemention at backbone and client connect [7:28655]

Dear All I am currently involved in providing intranet solution to my client. The situation is like this, 40 remote locations want to connect to Head Office. Bandwidth required is 64 Kbps. Initially ISDN is the preferred choice but client prefers permanent online solutions. One Telco service pr