Re: Multipoint/point-to-point(Fr ame-Relay) [7:61948]

actually, what i meant to say, is the coworkers and i when we had projects that output design comes out to be either P2M or P2P on subints, we usally choose the latter. if a corp already has P2M, then i would think that whoever designed the net had enough good reasons that out weighted the benefits

Re: Multipoint/point-to-point(Fr ame-Relay) [7:61948]

Hi Juntao, Thanx for the input, what about the existing Frame-relay networks u mean to say that they will be migrating to point-point sub-interfaces(networks). Might be more Input is required from experts here.Thanx once again. :) Juntao wrote: > > from what i've seen in enterprises, the tre

Re: Multipoint/point-to-point(Fr ame-Relay) [7:61948]

from what i've seen in enterprises, the trend seems to be going towards P2P with sub interfaces and ip unnumbered when needed, as it implies some trouble shooting constraints. i'm sure u know the issues that imply when using P2M(spilt horizon must be disabled, if your using EIGRP the bandwith comma

Multipoint/point-to-point(Fr ame-Relay) [7:61948]

Hi all, Generally what are mostly used in customer scenarios point to point or multipoint subinterfaces while confguring frame-relay.As U know all point -to point sub interface consumes lot no.of addreses all different subnets,although ip unnumbered is way to avoid this(ip unnumbered has the limit