NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]

2003-01-29 Thread Peter P
Can anyone give me a real world example of why you would need to consider using TCP Load Distribution. I am summarising slightly but TCP Load Distribution seems to be a method of using a single IP address (the Global Inside Address)inbound; which is handed off to different devices on the inside. OK

Re: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]

2003-01-29 Thread Juntao
hi it is nothing like HSRP, even if looked @ from the virtual IP point of view, for the simple reason that HSRP elects one active router and only router is active @ any time, (as opossed to TCP load Balacing, that uses all the ip's of the servers to forward data to) and the real ip of the active H

Re: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]

2003-01-29 Thread Peter P
Thanks for that. Is my 'real world' example right in broad conception ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62096&t=62088 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report mis

Re: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]

2003-01-29 Thread Juntao
Web server farm for ur ebiz site, u assign private address to the servers, and use only one public ip to access them all. ""Peter P"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks for that. Is my 'real world' example right in broad conception ? Message Posted at: http://www.grou

Re: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]

2003-01-29 Thread Juntao
sorry i didn't enphasis on a point that from i've written could be misleading, (the router must rebuild the packet fields and frame fields, then load balances to the servers.) the router will actually, nat the ip, forward the packet in which case a rewrite happens to the frame's mac. regards, ""Ju

RE: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]

2003-01-31 Thread Peter P
Right. OK. Therefore - lets say we have 6 servers in our farm each issued with RFC 1918 private address numbers. These get mapped to a singular global inside address. When our customers start hitting the servers - they get connected to one of the 6 servers in a round robin sequential fashion. This

RE: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]

2003-01-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes "Peter P" @groupstudy.com em 31/01/2003 09:56:20 Favor responder a "Peter P" Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto:RE: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088] Right. OK. Therefore - lets say we have 6 servers in our farm