NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread reden
Dear All, Anybody here who work for ISP that use NATed/PATed address for their clients? Is it appropriate for ISP to use NAT/PAT? Thanks Reden ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread JULIUS OMIDIORA
that.. Regards, Julius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 June 2000 09:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT for ISPs Dear All, Anybody here who work for ISP that use NATed/PATed address for their clients

Re: NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread tayta
I am a newbie I would hazard a guess that, for an ISP(assuming thousands of users) to do address translation would be a large technical feat, consuming more Hardware and other resources than the savings on registered IP addresses could justify Please correct me if I am wrong Tayta <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Current IP address allocation from ARIN assumes that ISPs will use private addressing and NAT for single-homed customers. They are reasonable about exceptions, such as protocols that won't work through NAT, but the exceptions need to be justified for the ISP to continue getting address space.

RE: NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread Irwin Lazar
ers. Does this sound familiar to you? Irwin -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NAT for ISPs Current IP address allocation from ARIN assumes that ISPs will use private addressi

Re: NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread John Nemeth
On Oct 28, 6:40am, "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: } } Current IP address allocation from ARIN assumes that ISPs will use } private addressing and NAT for single-homed customers. They are } reasonable about exceptions, such as protocols that won't work } through NAT, but the exceptions need to b

RE: NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
t present, the ARIN assumption is that 7 percent of cable customers will use IP service. ARIN will grant more than 7 percent if usage can be documented. > >-Original Message- >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:04 PM >

RE: NAT for ISPs

2000-06-07 Thread Andrew Lennon
On the subject of IP adressing, what about the 64.0.0.0 - 126.255.255.255 block ? Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: 07 June 2000 16:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAT for ISPs >Howard, >I s