137.20.1.0 255.255.255.192 would be the most exact match that
you could advertise
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Michael Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF inter-area summarization [7:44465]
I am trying to do
Larry,
I had the idea right to use 255.255.255.192 mask because that is where the
bit boundary is. My question is why can't you use the 137.20.1.32/26 to
summarize from 32-95. What if you had a subnet zero and didn't want that
summarized. Why do I have to use the 137.20.1.0 network for
Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSPF inter-area summarization [7:44465]
Larry,
I had the idea right to use 255.255.255.192 mask because that is where the
bit boundary is. My question is why can't you use the 137.20.1.32/26
Great explaination. I just had issues with not being able to use my .32
network address but now I see why.I am taking the road to CCIE very
carefully and try to understand exactly why things are the way they are.
That is why I love working on the networking end of things; There is a
definitive
I am trying to do a lab that needs a inter-area ospf summary address
configured
I have two loopbacks 137.20.1.17/28 and 137.20.1.33/28. These are then of
course on networks 137.20.1.16 and 137.20.1.32. Taking the last octet of the
subnets into binary we have:
16= 0001
32= 0010
Acording
I am trying to do a lab that needs a inter-area ospf summary address
configured
I have two loopbacks 137.20.1.17/28 and 137.20.1.33/28. These are then of
course on networks 137.20.1.16 and 137.20.1.32. Taking the last octet of the
subnets into binary we have:
16= 0001
32= 0010
Michal Witte
Try using area 11 range 137.20.1.0 255.255.255.192 instead.
Hope that works.
Schwantz
Michael Witte wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am trying to do a lab that needs a inter-area ospf summary address
configured
I have two loopbacks
7 matches
Mail list logo
