In the ACRC book (page 200), the author shows the 10.64.0.1/24
network being placed into an area 0 with the command:
network 10.64.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
Why is the wild card mask 0.0.0.0 used and not a mask
which matches the actual manner in which the network
has been subneted? Is
I've got a lot to learn in this arena, but I remember puzzling over that
until I got to the next page. The last sentence of the description of the
use of the wildcard-mask notes that you can specify an interface address by
using the wildcard mask 0.0.0.0--and given the linear arrangement in the
di
he wanted to show that you can use the whole network 10.0.0.0 in an
area.notice he use 255.255.255.255 as the mask of the area meaning everthing
or he could have
10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0
or
10.64.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
or
10.64.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
notice in the side hes states that you can
Brian,
In OSPF, the network statement activates OSPF routing on the
interfaces that match the address + mask combination. The
wildcard mask DOES NOT have to match the subnet masks used
on interfaces.
Consider the following config:
int e0
ip addr 10.64.0.1 255.255.255.128
int e1
ip addr 10.64.
>In the ACRC book (page 200), the author shows the 10.64.0.1/24
>network being placed into an area 0 with the command:
>
> network 10.64.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
>
>Why is the wild card mask 0.0.0.0 used and not a mask
>which matches the actual manner in which the network
>has been subnete
eld, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 10 May, 2000 21:59
Subject: OSPF question- network statement
>
> In the ACRC book (page 200), the author shows the 10.64.0.1/24
> network being placed into an area 0 with the command:
>
> network 10
gt; CCDA CCNA CBE CBI MCSE
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Field, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 May, 2000 21:59
> Subject: OSPF question- network statement
>
> >
> > In the ACRC book (page 200), the auth
7 matches
Mail list logo
