Re: PAT vs NAT

As you all have mentioned PAT is a many to one scenerio vs. NAT a one-to-one. Be careful with these terms, some people don't use the word PAT and NAT means different things to different people (masking, spoofing) PAT is generally a Cisco used phrase. But why use NAT vs. PAT? Well though it

Re: PAT vs NAT

NAT like u said is a one to one translation between the external IP and the internal one (at its purest form) When u use NAT overloading u r also using PAT, hence u really cannot compare the twoThey work in cunjunction I personally like to think of PAT as what most people refer to as NAT & I

PAT vs NAT

Can someone tell me any benefits to using NAT instead of PAT? I know with PAT, you can translate up to 64,000 addresses, but with NAT it is one to one. Thanks, Nathan Richie _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html R

Re: PAT vs NAT

d, please ellaborate on mapping hosts > using the PATed address on a cisco router. How could you statically map more > than one internal host using a PAT address? > > -Original Message- > From: Kent Hundley > To: Duncan Maccubbin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 6/6/00 2:04 PM &g

RE: PAT vs NAT

cally map more than one internal host using a PAT address? -Original Message- From: Kent Hundley To: Duncan Maccubbin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6/6/00 2:04 PM Subject: Re: PAT vs NAT The PAT implementation on the PIX does not currently support the ability to include port information i

Re: PAT vs NAT

> I'm wondering what NAT gives me over PAT. On my PIX I believe it >can do 65,000 translations on PAT. If I have <100 users behind it >what is the advantage of using NAT? > >Duncan First, you are slightly high on the architectural limit of the number of port translations that are possible on

Re: PAT vs NAT

The PAT implementation on the PIX does not currently support the ability to include port information in its static mappings. You need an additional IP address for every host you want to be globally accessible. For example, you couldn't reserve port 80 for an internal web server to be reachable v

Re: PAT vs NAT

Hi Duncan, With NAT you will need 100 ip address to allow 100 connections or you can limit the amount of web connectivity by only allowing say 10 connections. However with PAT you only need one outside address because you are using the port addresses. Regards Robert Duncan Maccubbin wrote: >

PAT vs NAT

I'm wondering what NAT gives me over PAT. On my PIX I believe it can do 65,000 translations on PAT. If I have <100 users behind it what is the advantage of using NAT? Duncan === Duncan Maccubbin | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Network Engineer MCP+I,MCSE,CC