Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread Up_and_Up
Hi All, HostA--Router1---Router2---HostB EtherSerial Ether If a packet is sent from HostA to HostB and the packet is lost between R1 and R2 - who resends? I've seen this question before and thought the generally agree

Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Hi All, > >HostA--Router1---Router2---HostB > EtherSerial Ether > >If a packet is sent from HostA to HostB and the packet is lost between R1 >and R2 - who resends? > >I've seen this question before and thought the gener

Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread Up_and_Up
Cool, thanks for the confirmation and the education. Funny thing, I'm using your Designing Routing and Switching book as one of my references. Thanks again, Sean C. CCNP, CCDP, MCSE ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >Hi All, > > > >HostA--

Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Cool, thanks for the confirmation and the education. > >Funny thing, I'm using your Designing Routing and Switching book as one of >my references. > >Thanks again, >Sean C. >CCNP, CCDP, MCSE One who references such works can do no wrong. :-) Seriously, I had been about to follow up anyway. You

Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 04:58 PM 4/14/01, Up_and_Up wrote: >Hi All, > >HostA--Router1---Router2---HostB > EtherSerial Ether > >If a packet is sent from HostA to HostB and the packet is lost between R1 >and R2 - who resends? > >I've seen this

Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread Sean C.
Thanks Priscilla, you caught an error that I had missed. You're totally right when writing that this was a decent wrap-up. With the amount of travelling I do, it's easier to carry this study guide around (appended with my notes that must take up any remaining space) then to lug around Perlman, H

RE: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread Dennis Laganiere
last four months of Lab prep. If anybody has any other corrections, or if you have anything to contribute to the conversation, feel free to contact me off-line... Thanks all... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Sean C. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04/14/2001 9:36 PM Subject: Re: Packet

Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-14 Thread John Neiberger
| > | >The reason I post this is I have found a contradictoring document and wanted | >some 2nd and 3rd opinions. The document in questions is the cramsession | >from BrainBuzz.com at the link: | > | >http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/cramsession/cisco/ccie_written/ | > I've read through t

Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-15 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 04:04 PM 4/15/01, you wrote: >Priscilla, > >With reference to the comment below: > >The cram > > session has the usual misconceptions, such as claiming that SRB and SRT are > > in 802.5, which they aren't, and that HSRP is a routing protocol that is > > standing by, (it's a router standing by),

RE: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-15 Thread Chuck Larrieu
D] Subject: Re: Packet retransmission [7:662] At 04:04 PM 4/15/01, you wrote: >Priscilla, > >With reference to the comment below: > >The cram > > session has the usual misconceptions, such as claiming that SRB and SRT are > > in 802.5, which they aren't, a

RE: Packet retransmission [7:662]

2001-04-16 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
tocol's >update cycle. >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 6:47 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject:Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]