Hi All,
HostA--Router1---Router2---HostB
EtherSerial Ether
If a packet is sent from HostA to HostB and the packet is lost between R1
and R2 - who resends?
I've seen this question before and thought the generally agree
>Hi All,
>
>HostA--Router1---Router2---HostB
> EtherSerial Ether
>
>If a packet is sent from HostA to HostB and the packet is lost between R1
>and R2 - who resends?
>
>I've seen this question before and thought the gener
Cool, thanks for the confirmation and the education.
Funny thing, I'm using your Designing Routing and Switching book as one of
my references.
Thanks again,
Sean C.
CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >Hi All,
> >
> >HostA--
>Cool, thanks for the confirmation and the education.
>
>Funny thing, I'm using your Designing Routing and Switching book as one of
>my references.
>
>Thanks again,
>Sean C.
>CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
One who references such works can do no wrong. :-)
Seriously, I had been about to follow up anyway. You
At 04:58 PM 4/14/01, Up_and_Up wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>HostA--Router1---Router2---HostB
> EtherSerial Ether
>
>If a packet is sent from HostA to HostB and the packet is lost between R1
>and R2 - who resends?
>
>I've seen this
Thanks Priscilla, you caught an error that I had missed.
You're totally right when writing that this was a decent wrap-up. With the
amount of travelling I do, it's easier to carry this study guide around
(appended with my notes that must take up any remaining space) then to lug
around Perlman, H
last four months of Lab prep. If anybody has
any other corrections, or if you have anything to contribute to the
conversation, feel free to contact me off-line...
Thanks all...
--- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Sean C.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04/14/2001 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: Packet
| >
| >The reason I post this is I have found a contradictoring document and
wanted
| >some 2nd and 3rd opinions. The document in questions is the cramsession
| >from BrainBuzz.com at the link:
| >
| >http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/cramsession/cisco/ccie_written/
| >
I've read through t
At 04:04 PM 4/15/01, you wrote:
>Priscilla,
>
>With reference to the comment below:
>
>The cram
> > session has the usual misconceptions, such as claiming that SRB and SRT
are
> > in 802.5, which they aren't, and that HSRP is a routing protocol that is
> > standing by, (it's a router standing by),
D]
Subject: Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]
At 04:04 PM 4/15/01, you wrote:
>Priscilla,
>
>With reference to the comment below:
>
>The cram
> > session has the usual misconceptions, such as claiming that SRB and SRT
are
> > in 802.5, which they aren't, a
tocol's
>update cycle.
>Chuck
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 6:47 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:Re: Packet retransmission [7:662]
11 matches
Mail list logo