RE: OSPF with passive interface [7:71395]

2003-06-25 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Shibu Nair wrote: If the interface configured as passive under OSPF routing protocol, will there be any neighbor relationship establish on that interface ? No. Passive interface means it doesn't send Hellos, which it would need to do to establish a neighbor relationship. Priscilla

Re: EIGRP passive-interface [7:52453]

2002-09-01 Thread Jon
It depends, if you are using backup interfaces then EIGRP won't bring the line up obviously. I suspect that you are using floating statics though, in which case, if you just specify passive interface then no adjacency will be formed regardless of the state of the interface. If you then specify

Re: EIGRP passive-interface [7:52453]

2002-09-01 Thread james kang
in which case, if you just specify passive interface then no adjacency will be formed regardless of the state of the interface. If you then specify a neighbor so it is unicast, it will bring the line up (an keep it up) if it is defined as interesting traffic. If it isn't seen as int

RE: EIGRP passive-interface [7:52453]

2002-09-01 Thread Scott Pleitner
interface to potentially provide cover for multiple pvc's. S. -Original Message- From: james kang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 2 September 2002 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EIGRP passive-interface [7:52453] Jon, thanks a lot. your explanation is very clear. best

EIGRP passive-interface [7:52453]

2002-08-31 Thread james kang
hi, anyone I am preparing the CCIE lab. there r one question about eigrp on BRI. i am using bri to backup frame relay connection. to prevent the eigrp from bring up the isdn line, i prefer the command passive-interface than filter list. but i am wondering whether the router can form the eigrp

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-03 Thread CCIEn2002
Thank you for all your input. This has helped me a great deal. David - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: CCIEn2002 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: RE: Passive Interface Help [7:30648] A passive interface prevents a routing protocol from advertising its

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread cheekin
network 12.0.0.0 to be advertised, remove the network 12.0.0.0 statement or use distribute-list to filter out the route. Regards, cheekin - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 15:03 Subject: Passive Interface Help [7:30648] Happy New Year!! I need a little

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread John Neiberger
The passive-interface command stops routing updates from exiting that interface or--in the case of EIGRP, OSPF, and IS-IS--it stop hello packets from exiting which keeps neighbor relationships from forming. This command won't keep a connected network from showing up in your routing table

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread CCIEn2002
Thank you for the info. Now I am a little confused still on the passive interface. If it prevents routing updates from being sent out, why would one want a passive interface. From my understanding, a passive interface would not advertise is routing updates to its neighbor. If that is the case, I

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread Chuck Larrieu
]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thank you for the info. Now I am a little confused still on the passive interface. If it prevents routing updates from being sent out, why would one want a passive interface. From my understanding, a passive interface would not advertise is routing update

Re: Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread John Neiberger
As I mentioned in my first reply, the passive-interface command operates a little differently depending on the protocol you're using. For protocols that need to establish neighbors--such as EIGRP, OSPF, and IS-IS--this command stops those relationships from forming so no routes will ever

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread matt shiite
Are these routers directly connected? If so, that explains why you would still be able to ping. Did you try to use loopback interfaces and see if those routes are being announced? ms --- CCIEn2002 wrote: Thank you for the info. Now I am a little confused still on the passive interface

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread Chuck Larrieu
protocol advertising should occur. All of the examples surrounding the passive-interface default command ( available in IOS 12.0 and higher ) that I have seen on CCO specifically reference ISP requirements. Essentially, why advertise internal routes and updates out every dial up and DSL

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
as passive ( for the ISP IGP ) and will then specifically activate interfaces where route and routing protocol advertising should occur. All of the examples surrounding the passive-interface default command ( available in IOS 12.0 and higher ) that I have seen on CCO specifically reference ISP

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread MADMAN
Kludge!!! I'd rather refer to these features as job security :-) Dave Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: For that matter, why advertise routes on any leaf network that only has end nodes? In the IP world, most end nodes (workstations) don't care about routing updates. (It could be argued that

Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-02 Thread Tom Lisa
Dave, If you want job security, become a tenured professor. Low pay but lots of security! :) Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy MADMAN wrote: Kludge!!! I'd rather refer to these features as job security :-) Dave Priscilla

Passive Interface Help [7:30648]

2002-01-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Happy New Year!! I need a little help on what a passive interface is. From what I can gather, a passive interface does not advertise its route to its neighbor ? Now if that is the case, why can I still ping an interface that is set to passive. Please note: This is excluding directly connected

Passive-interface in OSPF

2001-01-11 Thread Jaeheon Yoo
. - I tested it by myself, Yes, it is true when you believe what the debugger says, "debug ip packet" reports it's sending hellos on a passive interface, But on the other end, the same "debug ip packet" says no hellos from t

Re: Passive-interface in OSPF

2001-01-11 Thread Mason Eike
--- I tested it by myself, Yes, it is true when you believe what the debugger says, "debug ip packet" reports it's sending hellos on a passive interface, But on the other end, the same "debug ip packet" says no hellos from the passive interface are received. So what's going on

Re: Passive-interface

2000-05-30 Thread Deepak Ravindra
was wondering...as Cisco says...passive interface is there to block routing updates from going across. Hello packets do not contain routing updates...they are a mechanism of keeping a router connected and alive in the OSPF n/w Deepak Ravindra CCNA,ACRC... "Dave" [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Passive-interface

2000-05-30 Thread Dave
yes, but there is no reason for OSPF routers to know about each other unless they are going to exchange topology databases. Look it up in Cisco Documentation, Hello's will not be passed on a passive-interface. -- Dave CCNP/CCDP/CCAI ""Deepak Ravindra"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro

Passive-interface

2000-05-26 Thread Thorne, Magnus
Will the passive-interface command stop OSPF's hellos? -Magnus Magnus Thorne eVoice, Inc. 1394 Williow Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Direct: 650.330.3974 Main: 650.330.3700 Fax: 650.330.3901

Re: Passive-interface

2000-05-26 Thread Dave
B7@ev-cal-ex01">news:8B5B58F220FCD311879600508B652072478AB7@ev-cal-ex01... Will the passive-interface command stop OSPF's hellos? -Magnus Magnus Thorne eVoice, Inc. 1394 Williow Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Direct: 650.330.3974 Main: 650