Check out an EIGRP protocol analyzer trace and you'll see poison reverse in
action. It is more proactive then what you describe.
When Router A tells Router B "I can get to Network X," Router B tells
Router A, "I can't get to Network X."
What Router B is really saying is "I can't get to Network
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Studying for the CCNA, I'm having trouble figuring out what the deal is with
> poisen reverse.
>
> I understand split horizon as not sending route updates back out the port
> they are received on, and I understand route poisening as specifically
Studying for the CCNA, I'm having trouble figuring out what the deal is with
poisen reverse.
I understand split horizon as not sending route updates back out the port
they are received on, and I understand route poisening as specifically
advertising a down route as bad, as opposed to just no
3 matches
Mail list logo
