Re: QoS testing - well, that explains it [7:55468]

2002-10-14 Thread The Long and Winding Road
""Jenny McLeod"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Are you pinging directly from the router where the QoS stuff is configured, > or are the pings going through the router? > CL: Side_1frame_relay--QoS_Router---token_ringSide_2 I ping from r

RE: QoS testing - well, that explains it [7:55468]

2002-10-13 Thread Jenny McLeod
Are you pinging directly from the router where the QoS stuff is configured, or are the pings going through the router? JMcL The Long and Winding Road wrote: > > the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing > > > As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a > means of tes

Re: QoS testing - well, that explains it [7:55468]

2002-10-12 Thread The Long and Winding Road
""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message news:200210122242.WAA31971@;groupstudy.com... > Are you configuring these access-lists as packet filters only or part of > QoS? CL: all three. CL: I have done packet filtering both ways on the interface, I have done WRED on the interfaces. I have done WRED as p

Re: QoS testing - well, that explains it [7:55468]

2002-10-12 Thread Ken Diliberto
Are you configuring these access-lists as packet filters only or part of QoS? >>> "The Long and Winding Road" 10/12/02 01:42PM >>> the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a means of testing QoS configurations. I have done a

QoS testing - well, that explains it [7:55468]

2002-10-12 Thread The Long and Winding Road
the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a means of testing QoS configurations. I have done any number of tests this morning. all of the following have been applied inbound on an interface: access-list 171 deny ip any any p