I have configured a few Flexwans with ATM and frame relay and they
work quite well. If you have redundant sup/MSFC's I would recommend
running SRM as opposed the config-sync on the MSFC's.
Dave
Tim Potier wrote:
>
> I have a choice here, and am not sure of the load probs. Core can be a
65
"MADMAN" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have configured a few Flexwans with ATM and frame relay and they
> work quite well. If you have redundant sup/MSFC's I would recommend
> running SRM as opposed the config-sync on the MSFC's.
>
> Dave
SRM -vs- config sy
Running SRM is my choice as well. Can you point me to a Cisco documentation
site for the config of the FlexWAN. I know you configure it through the
MSFC, but looking for some examples (maybe some of your own).
Also, what version of code have you done this with MADMAN? I see that
before 12.1(3a
"Michael L. Williams" wrote:
>
> "MADMAN" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I have configured a few Flexwans with ATM and frame relay and they
> > work quite well. If you have redundant sup/MSFC's I would recommend
> > running SRM as opposed the config-sync on
I the lab I am currently running 12.1.8b.E7 on the MSFC and 6.3.5 on
the cat.
I currently only have a PA-4T on the flex WAN, was doing some frame
relay testing. The configs are like any other router.
Dave
interface Serial7/0/0
mtu 1000
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
no keepali
Thanks... that looks easy enough. I thought that there may be some tricky
int configuration nonsense since you config from MSFC, but the actual PA was
physically in another slot.
thanks again
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41999&t=41904
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
