Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-14 Thread Henrique Duarte
Thank you everyone for the feedback. Although configuring the default gateway on PC2 with its own IP address allowed me to ping from PC1 to PC2, it caused some other problems in a part of the network that I omitted, so I had to re-configure it back without a default gateway. Let me re-draw the

Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-14 Thread Henrique Duarte
diagram re-sent: |---Private Network| --Public Network--| e0 e1 e0 e1 e0 e1 e0 e1 PC1---routerArouterB-PC2-routerC-Internet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44279&t=44

Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-14 Thread Henrique Duarte
" 5/13/02 3:50:37 PM >>> > John, > thanks for the feedback. > So PC2 doesn't have a default gateway configured and will send a > broadcast > for the address of PC1. Since router B is on the same subnet and > "knows" > where PC1 is, shouldn

Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-14 Thread John Neiberger
igured and will send a broadcast for the address of PC1. Since router B is on the same subnet and "knows" where PC1 is, shouldn't it respond as a proxy? -H - Original Message ----- From: "John Neiberger" To: Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:13 PM Subject: Re: ARP pro

RE: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-14 Thread Ouellette, Tim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108] John, thanks for the feedback. So PC2 doesn't have a default gateway configured and will send a broadcast for the address of PC1. Since router B is on the same

Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-14 Thread Henrique Duarte
ohn Neiberger" To: Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:13 PM Subject: Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108] > Unless you're bridging, ARP doesn't function here the way I _think_ you > think it does. > > If PC2 receives an incoming ICMP echo request and it wants to generate > a

Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-13 Thread Michael L. Williams
I couldn't have said it better myself. good show! Mike W. "John Neiberger" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Unless you're bridging, ARP doesn't function here the way I _think_ you > think it does. > > If PC2 receives an incoming ICMP echo request and it wants

RE: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-13 Thread Rob Ehlers
When PC2 attempts to send a response, it checks its routing table first. No default gateway, no route to host. Done. It won't check the arp table, because it the process stops at layer 3 (IP) when it can't find a route to PC1. Instead of adding a static arp entry, you could add just a static ip r

Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-13 Thread John Neiberger
Unless you're bridging, ARP doesn't function here the way I _think_ you think it does. If PC2 receives an incoming ICMP echo request and it wants to generate a response, it first compares the network portion of the destination address to its own subnet. If you're not bridging they will be diff