ice,
| > Ray Mosely
| > CCNA, MCSE
| >
| > -Original Message-
| > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| > John Neiberger
| > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 2:06 AM
| > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Subject: RE: back to back cables [7:527]
| >
|
e has the part number for an actual
> Cisco back to back cable, which is all that I asked
> for in the first place, I would like to see
> this thread buried.
>
> Thanks to everyone for their advice,
> Ray Mosely
> CCNA, MCSE
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAI
he first place, I would like to see
this thread buried.
Thanks to everyone for their advice,
Ray Mosely
CCNA, MCSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: bac
doesn't, to my knowledge,
| make a back to back cable. I'm not allowed to
| order a third party cable.
| Ray M.
|
| -Original Message-
| From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 4:42 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
ril 13, 2001 4:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: back to back cables [7:527]
>
>
> Do I even dare ask why you are allowed to use two regular cables but not
> a back to back cable?
>
> Hmm... while writing that I just thought of one good reas
01 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: back to back cables [7:527]
> I'm looking at a cable in my lab, CAB-HD60MMX-5, which is a nice short
cable
> (5ft) and is DTE 60 pin on one side and DCE 60 pin on the other. It's got
> the Cisco blue and the housing looks just like my other Cisco
Ray Mosely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 6:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: back to back cables [7:527]
>
>
> It's simple. Cisco doesn't, to my knowledge,
> make a back to back cable. I'm not allowed to
> orde
r a third party cable.
> Ray M.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 4:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: back to back cables [7:527]
>
>
> Do I even dare as
ED]
Subject: Re: back to back cables [7:527]
Do I even dare ask why you are allowed to use two regular cables but not
a back to back cable?
Hmm... while writing that I just thought of one good reason. Whenever
I order a back-to-back cable I usually get an RS-232 cable. This would
tend to limit
Ray,
Visit the http://www.pacificcable.com It has all Cisco cables and part
number.
""Ray Mosely"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm sorry to bring up this old old old
> thread, but I'm in a situation where I
> need a back to back cable for some 2501's,
> bu
Do I even dare ask why you are allowed to use two regular cables but not
a back to back cable?
Hmm... while writing that I just thought of one good reason. Whenever
I order a back-to-back cable I usually get an RS-232 cable. This would
tend to limit the clock rate between the two routers. If I
Pinning out the DB-60 is rather hard to do. You can go to Ebay and get the
back to back V35 cables. If you use the DTE and DCE RS-232 Cables you are
limited to 128k
Correct me if I am wrong
Tim Fermanis
GCCS System Administrator
CCNA, MCP
Getronics Government Solutions
USAFE CSS/SCOG
DS
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=345619968
This is a link to eBay
Ramon Lugo
-Original Message-
From: Mark Holloway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 2:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Back to Back cables?
I remember there was a web sit
13 matches
Mail list logo
