Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-14 Thread John Neiberger
T costs are calculated for cisco OSPF interfaces based upon traditional bandwidth values associated with interface types. What's not clear is how the ospf process does this. Does anyone have any insight? - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Monday,

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-14 Thread Kevin Cullimore
sight? - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:42 PM Subject: Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055] > Setting the bandwidth would affect OSPF also. This isn't necessarily a bad > thing, though. You probably wouldn't be ru

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-14 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Thanks all for those who responded. I really appreciate for each one of your responses and I got a real understanding from each ones answer. Thanks once again. Rajesh Rajesh Kumar wrote: > Hi all, > > CCIE Practical studies - Vol I book - EIGRP chapter says that the > bandwidth command used

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread Steve Ringley
For what its worth, my studies during my CCNP prep indicated the textbook solution was to set BW = Port Speed on the physical interface, and BW = CIR on the subinterfaces. I also found 2600 routers with internal CSUs actually adjust BW to equal the number of channels configured on the CSU. Setti

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Setting the bandwidth would affect OSPF also. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, though. You probably wouldn't be running both routing protocols on the same interface, for one thing. But if you were, then you would want them both to use a metric that's based on the actual bandwidth for the pat

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread John Neiberger
. - Original Message ----- From: "John Neiberger" To: ; Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055] > >>> "W. Alan Robertson" 5/13/02 1:06:25 PM > >>> > >Rajesh, > > > >Correct... The bandwid

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread W. Alan Robertson
n't mean to suggest that OSPF cost isn't related to bandwidth... I should have written more clearly. :) I yield the balance of my time... - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" To: ; Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055] &

RE: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread Wright, Jeremy
Please reference Doyle Episode 1 bottom of pg 485 and you will see how bandwidth and costs relate. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055] >>>

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread John Neiberger
>>> "W. Alan Robertson" 5/13/02 1:06:25 PM >>> >Rajesh, > >Correct... The bandwidth statement has no impact on other routing >protocols, like OSPF. OSPF looks at the "cost" of a link in >determining best path. There's no direct correllation between >"bandwidth" and "cost." There isn't? How d

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
OSPF cost is based on the bandwidth setting on Cisco routers. The cost of an interface defaults to 100,000,000 divided by the bandwidth for the interface. For example, a 100-Mbps Ethernet interface has a cost of 1. Priscilla At 03:06 PM 5/13/02, W. Alan Robertson wrote: >Rajesh, > >Correct...

Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]

2002-05-13 Thread W. Alan Robertson
Rajesh, Correct... The bandwidth statement has no impact on other routing protocols, like OSPF. OSPF looks at the "cost" of a link in determining best path. There's no direct correllation between "bandwidth" and "cost." As for what to set "bandwidth" to, you set it on both ends of a connectio