Re: Behavior of Cisco PAT/NAT?

2000-12-11 Thread Brian
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Benjamin Walling wrote: > If I set up a NAT pool of only 1 address, the router/pix uses PAT. Under > PAT, I can have 65K hosts (or connections from hosts) connecting to the > internet. > > If I set up a NAT pool of more than 1 address, the router/pix uses NAT. > Under NAT, I

RE: Behavior of Cisco PAT/NAT?

2000-12-11 Thread David Wolsefer
You will want to use the overload parameter. Here is the syntax, notice that the overload parameter is optional: ip nat inside source {list {access-list-number | name} pool name [overload] | static local-ip global-ip} Here is what overload does: "You can conserve addresses in the inside global

RE: Behavior of Cisco PAT/NAT?

2000-12-11 Thread Christopher Larson
Your users will will get 1 host per address under NAT unless you specifiy overload command. I beleive then that any additioanl users will use the last address in the pool and PAT on that address. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Walling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 1

Re: Behavior of Cisco PAT/NAT?

2000-12-11 Thread Charles Henson
There is an argument in the firewall that permits PATting of a NAT pool. The argument goes at the end of the nat pool statement and is "overload" IE: ip nat inside source list access-list-number interface interface overload This allows the firewall to PAT addresses when in runs out of "unique" a