]
Subject: Re: CAT6500 running on second Supervisor Engine card [7:27544]
Thanks All for the reply! When I look at that manufacturing part number for
the supervisor engines, the part number are little bit different between the
first and the second sup. engine. The second supervisor engine has a &qu
There is no slot specific sup card except for they mudt go in either
slot 1 or 2
Dave
Thomas wrote:
>
> Thanks All for the reply! When I look at that manufacturing part number
for
> the supervisor engines, the part number are little bit different between
the
> first and the second sup. engin
Thanks All for the reply! When I look at that manufacturing part number for
the supervisor engines, the part number are little bit different between the
first and the second sup. engine. The second supervisor engine has a "/2"
or something like that at the end of the part number. Does that mean
No problem with that. Both supervisor are fully functional. At my work we
use either single chassis, dual sup or dual chassis, single sup to provide
redundancy. Works fine.
ccie1ab
-Original Message-
From: Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:42 AM
To:
Yes you can do that no problemo. Even if the current 6506 is in
production you can pull the inactive sup and "shouldn't" drop a packet
assuming your don't have HSRP running with active interfaces on the
second MSFC.
Dave
Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a CAT 6506 with dual supervisor e
5 matches
Mail list logo
