; is much more
> what protocol
> > designers consider in creating protocol specifications,
> while
> > "principles"
> > detail the implementation requirements and options --
> and how they
> work
> > _within_ the protocol specifications.
> >
> > &
protocol
> designers consider in creating protocol specifications, while
> "principles"
> detail the implementation requirements and options -- and how they
work
> _within_ the protocol specifications.
>
> >
> >-Original Message-
> &g
ebruary 22, 2003 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: CCIE Written Traning [7:63494]
> You're talking about the old exam. While the Caslow book
probably still
> covers some of the material on the new exam, the new exam
is much more in
> depth on goofy stuff. Follow the blueprint for the b
tuff.
>The Boson test by the same Dennis was the icing on the cake
>for me...you will probably want to
>know MPLS/Multicast and QOS also now
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Kaminski, Shawn G"
>To:
>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:11 AM
>Subject: RE: CCIE
ECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Written Traning [7:63494]
I studied the caslow book and did the paper by Dennis L. on
the sna token ring stuff.
The Boson test by the same Dennis was the icing on the cake
for me...you will probably want to
know
-
From: "Kaminski, Shawn G"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: CCIE Written Traning [7:63494]
> I don't know of any training classes for the CCIE Written,
probably because
> the CCIE Written covers a lot of oddball technologies,
etc. If you did fin
I don't know of any training classes for the CCIE Written, probably because
the CCIE Written covers a lot of oddball technologies, etc. If you did find
a class, all they would probably do is go over the topics on the CCIE
Written blueprint. Why bother paying for a class when you can do that for
fre
7 matches
Mail list logo
