pril 11, 2001 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CID beta [7:206]
Good response... but I personally would grovel a little more :-)
""F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I meant to say "lad
Good response... but I personally would grovel a little more :-)
""F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I meant to say "lady", but you know, I'm only 25, so when I speak to
> a woman that sounds younger than me I slip up and use "girl". She
>
I meant to say "lady", but you know, I'm only 25, so when I speak to
a woman that sounds younger than me I slip up and use "girl". She
couldn't have been older than 22, plus she had a very pleasant
voice... It's not like if I'm a 40 year old engineer defaming
women...
I hope I did not inadvert
Never know Priscilla- could have been a das Frdulein :o)
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: CID beta [7:206]
> At 10:35 AM 4/11/01, F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz wrote:
> >I called them right around 8 EST tim
At 10:35 AM 4/11/01, F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz wrote:
>I called them right around 8 EST time and got an ambiguous response
>from them. I've learned from experience that beta exams appear in
>Prometric's systems as "failed" until they get the records uploaded
>from the company who the test is for. The g
I called them right around 8 EST time and got an ambiguous response
from them. I've learned from experience that beta exams appear in
Prometric's systems as "failed" until they get the records uploaded
from the company who the test is for. The girl I spoke to stated
such, mumbling to herself, "w
6 matches
Mail list logo
