ittle more expensive, but better in the long run.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 6:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cascading Switches
Why cascade them rather than using hub/spoke connectivity?
Gareth
&quo
Why cascade them rather than using hub/spoke connectivity?
Gareth
""Maness, Drew"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've looked through the archives as well as on CCO but could not find a
> definite answer to the limit of "cascading" switches, sp
Depends on the limitation of the diameter of the spanning tree ?
Thanks
Vincent
""Maness, Drew"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've looked through the archives as well as on CCO but could not find a
> definite answer to the limit of "cascading" swi
Hi,
I can't find my figures but off memory you can have 5 bridges between 2 devices
therefore you could have up to 5 switches between two clients or client -> server.
This would probably suggest the to go more than 3 deep in your cascading could present
a problem but could the links cope.
Ru
I've never done it with 2900s, but the product docs seem to talk about it:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca2900.htm
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.ne
5 matches
Mail list logo
