RE: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN

2001-02-19 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
ts. -Original Message- From: Germain, PJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 19, 2001 1:12 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN They are all DPEN600s or better. But, mostly all are DPEN600. 600MhZ with 130 MB RAM. -

Re: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN

2001-02-19 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi, Check out how much bandwith each user uses, check how much memory is required. I have spent a considerable amount of time using products such as 'Ecoscope' various 'sniffers' and monitors all to check on Citrix. Over the years I keep coming to the same point. Basically as I understand Ci

RE: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN

2001-02-19 Thread Tim Lovelace
I would start with the basics and send a few large ping packet the servers way from various locations. If some introduce more latency than others try a tracert or two and see where the latency is. If there isnt any latency I would say you dont have a network problem unless you are doing some queui

RE: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN

2001-02-20 Thread Jay Dunn
Based upon the information given and all things being equal, it would seem that the problem has to be either in the 3660 or that the LAN/WAN clients have some configuration that is different from the remote sites. Are the LAN/WAN clients on VLANs?. Do they possibly have an older ICA client than th

Re: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN

2001-02-20 Thread mtieast
We had had the same issues and a similiar situation. We enabled priority queueing for a time (Which worked great) and then moved to a custom queue as our Citrix traffic increased and started hogging all the bandwidth. This made quite a difference of course and may be something you wanna try.

RE: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN

2001-02-20 Thread Moe Tavakoli
Have you looked to see if any of your links are in half-duplex mode? This may be causing the slowdown on the inside. moe. --- Jay Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based upon the information given and all things > being equal, it would seem > that the problem has to be either in the 3660 or > t