RE: DELL

2000-05-23 Thread William E Gragido
I thought that this board was specifically targeting all things Cisco? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 12:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DELL > > > Pos

RE: DELL

2000-05-24 Thread Dollard Morgan
totally unrelated, im sorry but in my book novell and NT are not NETWORKS, nor are they NEtworking positions. its system. i do like the idea that job offers can be sent out to the list, thats pretty cool. > -Message d'origine- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Date:

RE: DELL

2000-05-24 Thread Clark_Westerman
]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DELL totally unrelated, im sorry but in my book novell and NT are not NETWORKS, nor are they NEtworking positions. its system. i do like the idea that job offers can be sent out to the list, thats pretty cool. > -Message d

RE: DELL

2000-05-24 Thread Cisco God
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: DELL >Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 08:23:15 -0500 > >We are aware NT and Novell are not networks-that they are operating systems >to facilitate utilization of particular sy

RE: DELL

2000-05-24 Thread Dave Swink
t: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 6:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: DELL > > > The job titles have little importance, but I don't see anywhere > in your job > description where the word "Cisco"

RE: DELL

2000-05-24 Thread McElhaney, Scott
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco God Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 4:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DELL The job titles have little importance, but I don't see anywhere in your job descripti

RE: DELL

2000-05-24 Thread Jay Hennigan
On Wed, 24 May 2000, McElhaney, Scott wrote: > Why do you have to be so stupid. You have made some idiotic assumptions > about this posting. This is a jobs list and someone is posting a job in a > related field and you are so high and mighty to assume this has nothing to > do with Cisco?? Which

RE: DELL

2000-05-25 Thread Dollard Morgan
e- > De: Jay Hennigan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Date: jeudi 25 mai 2000 04:45 > À:McElhaney, Scott > Cc: 'Cisco God'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Objet:RE:

RE: DELL

2000-05-25 Thread Starry Eyes
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: DELL >Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 17:48:59 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from [208.242.122.8] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBAF5BDEC0053D820F3EDD0F27A085B

RE: DELL

2000-05-26 Thread Cisco God
t;From: "McElhaney, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "McElhaney, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Cisco God'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >"&

RE: DELL

2000-05-26 Thread Lilly, Glenn
3 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: DELL > > I don't assume anything about the job that is not stated in the > recruiter's email. His email men

Re: Dell switches [7:50934]

2002-08-08 Thread Chuck
The Dell switch product line is the spawn of the underworld. Using Dell switches will cause your teeth to fall out and hair to grow on your palms. Dell switches will make your food taste like dust and your water taste like vinegar. Don't even ask what happens to your packets as they cross a Dell b

Re: Dell switches [7:50934]

2002-08-10 Thread John Chang
This is not intended to offend anyone: Just thought professionals could be just that and wanted an objective answer if you had used a Dell managed switch. Thank you. At 01:07 AM 8/9/2002 +, Chuck wrote: >The Dell switch product line is the spawn of the underworld. Using Dell >switches w

Re: Dell switches [7:50934]

2002-08-10 Thread Chuck Larrieu
To: "Chuck" ; Sent: Saturday, 10 August, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Dell switches [7:50934] > This is not intended to offend anyone: Just thought professionals could be > just that and wanted an objective answer if you had used a Dell managed > switch. Thank you. > > > >

Re: Dell switches [7:50934]

2002-08-10 Thread Joe Rubino
I have to concur with my colleague Mr. Brunner’s 8/8 post and add this: If Cisco would lower their Cost they wouldn’t be shooting themselves in the foot. Yeah, Yeah I know Cisco quality and support… Ok they are still the king of the hill and FOR THE MOST PART you get what you pay for; however, p

Re: Dell switches [7:50934]

2002-08-10 Thread Gaz
I think it was humo(u)r John. I'm an eternal infant and appreciate the poor humo(u)r as much as the serious replies. Have a beer Have a 'Chuck'le.:-) Sorry, not seen much of Dell switches, but no doubt if you get enough sarcastic infantile replies it will keep the thread alive to be read by some

Re: Dell switches [7:50934]

2002-08-10 Thread John Chang
hought it funny, and ignore it if they thought >otherwise. > > >- Original Message - >From: "John Chang" >To: "Chuck" ; >Sent: Saturday, 10 August, 2002 9:33 AM >Subject: Re: Dell switches [7:50934] > > > > This is not intended to offen

re: Dell switches [7:51160]

2002-08-10 Thread Zeke Gibson
Hi all, I've worked with several of the Dell PowerConnect switches, a few of my customers chose to purchase them because of the attractive price, after all it is an access switch (the 2124's) I don't have much to say other than that I havn't run into any issues, they have a slick web interface (w