RE: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-15 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
See comments inline: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Werner Sent: February 14, 2001 10:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. Okay, here's the jist of things. Big huge mondo

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work

2001-02-14 Thread Pierre-Alex
-Original Message- From: Ahmed Aden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:50 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: Lachisho; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Yonkerbonk; Dale Cunningham Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work Just in case, do a 'show port channel' to verify

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work

2001-02-14 Thread Pierre-Alex
-Original Message- From: Ahmed Aden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:50 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: Lachisho; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Yonkerbonk; Dale Cunningham Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work Just in case, do a 'show port channel' to verify

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-14 Thread Pierre-Alex
, February 14, 2001 1:29 AM To: Pierre-Alex; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail) Cc: Dale Cunningham Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. Okay, here's the jist of things. The Catalyst 2924XL is the root bridge: C2924XL#sh span Spanning tree 1 is executing the IEEE compatible

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-14 Thread Yonkerbonk
Cunningham Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. Okay, here's the jist of things. The Catalyst 2924XL is the root bridge: C2924XL#sh span Spanning tree 1 is executing the IEEE compatible Spanning Tree protocol Bridge Identifier has priority 32768

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-14 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
Cunningham Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. Hi Leigh Anne and others: Leigh Anne, I hope you did not loose sleep over this problem At 8:30 PM after a full day on this problem I went to sleep and crashed So here we again: You discovered correctly that PORT

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work

2001-02-14 Thread Karen E Young
; Dale Cunningham :Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work : : :Just in case, do a 'show port channel' to verify that it did not create a :fast etherchannel. If it didn't create a channel, you should see a :message like: : :'No ports channelling' : : :Ahmed Aden - 703.798.7158

Re: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-14 Thread Paul Werner
Okay, here's the jist of things. Big huge mondo snip... So... do we have an active looped topology? I doubt it. Likely, Spanning Tree's working just fine. Check the LED's on both of your switches to see if you see a solid orange glow... Leigh Anne, I like your style and

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-13 Thread Rik Guyler
Your output shows some unexpected content in this case. I would have expected the path costs to be equal. Did you experiment with some of the fine-tuning options of STP? Also, are you sure that you are not channeling (Etherchannel)? On the larger Cats (4k, 6k, etc.) PAGP runs by default and

Re: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-13 Thread Yonkerbonk
Could you send a config for both switches? How about a fuller show spantree? A show port on the two ports? Maybe this is caused by some half-duplex, full-duplex issue... though I can't rationalize that explanation. The fact that one port shows the switch as being the root bridge and the other

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-13 Thread Pierre-Alex
: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 6:26 PM To: Pierre-Alex; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dale Cunningham Subject: Re: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. Could you send a config for both switches? How about a fuller show spantree? A show port on the two ports? Maybe this is caused by some

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work

2001-02-13 Thread Ahmed Aden
rrier, 0 no carrier 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out C2924XL# Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yonkerbonk Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 6:26 PM To: Pierre-Alex; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dale Cunn

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-13 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
PROTECTED]; Dale Cunningham Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. snip C2924XL#  sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service pad no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname C2924XL ! enable secret 5 $1$OixX

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-13 Thread Yonkerbonk
The 2924XL doesn't have trunking configured on Fa0/21, while it is configured on Fa0/27 of the C1912 it is connected to. I would have thought this would cause baby giant errors on 2924XL's Fa0/21, but it doesn't look like there are any. But anyways, try to set it up and see if that works. The

RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.

2001-02-13 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
Leigh Anne Chisholm Sent: February 13, 2001 10:22 PM To: Cisco@Groupstudy. Com Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. Which ports on the 2924XL are trunking? The only port I can see configured for trunking is FA0/20. I'm not clear on exactly where you've conne