RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, Is it a MUST to configure 'fragmentation' (under 1.5M wan link) when enabling LLQ (for voip over frame-relay)? How about if One side connection is FR but another is just a simply leased line? Thanks. rgds, ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60939&t=59820

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, Please encure that LLQ( when u use Priority command) is supported on following IOS LLQ on Frame-Relay supported on Ver 12.1(2)T(Your config has frame-relay) and on other interfaces u need 12.0(7)T... -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, Dec

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi Ivan, Comments within lines >From: "Ivan Yip" >Hi All, >I am a little bit confused about LLQ. Below is my understanding after >digesting some documentation and feedback from others. Please correct me if >I'm wrong. >1. LLQ=PQ+CBWFQ and PQ is defined by using 'priority' You are correct. >2.

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi All, Thanks all information. I am a little bit confused about LLQ. Below is my understanding after digesting some documentation and feedback from others. Please correct me if I'm wrong. 1. LLQ=PQ+CBWFQ and PQ is defined by using 'priority' 2. if using 'bandwidth', then I'm not using LLQ. What

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

ll ping packets than many large FTP packets. Rik -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 December 2002 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820] Hi, I got the following information during debug. 128K_LL

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, I got the following information during debug. 128K_LL#debug priority Priority output queueing debugging is on 128K_LL# 3d01h: now 263877385 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263877750 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263877754 tokens 4288

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, Use debug priority (for LLQ)while simulating and see if u get any info.. -Original Message- From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 3:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820] Hi, Thanks your information. My

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, Thanks your information. My goal is to make sure from certain source ip (eg, voice gateway) to have guaranteed bandwidth under link congestion. Under normal cases, it can up to 128k. Therefore, 'rate-limit' is not my solution. Due to limited resources, pc2 will upload dummy ftp traffic to th

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi Ivan, Your configuration is ok,But I want want to stress that when you configure "Bandwidth" command under class-map you achieve CBWFQ and When u are configuring "Priority" command under class-map you are achieving LLQ. As you might know that both this method are congestion management Techniqu