We use valid addresses as loopback in OSPF, so we assigned an entire class C
to loopbackaddresses on routers.
it works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Edmondson, Dorothy M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2001 10:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Assigning recognizable addresses with /32 masks would be considered best
practises in my opinion. Ideally, these are publicly routable in the SP
space.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/22/2001 at 9:02 AM Edmondson, Dorothy M wrote:
Is there a preferred addressing scheme for
Loopback is always advertised as 32bit host route no matter what mask you
assign to it.
To advertise it as a subnet route, use ip ospf network point-to-point
under int loop0
Cheers,
YY
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Edmondson, Dorothy
-
From: YY
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: Loopback0 with Mask of 255.255.255.255 ?? [7:16796]
Loopback is always advertised as 32bit host route no matter what mask you
assign to it.
To advertise it as a subnet route, use ip ospf network point-to-point
under int
4 matches
Mail list logo
