RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-19 Thread Srivathsan Ananthachari
You might wanna check this link . http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk80/technologies_tech_note09186a0 0800ef7b2.shtml Thanks, Srivathsan A -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Poulin, Darnell Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:48 PM To: [EM

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-19 Thread Chirag Arora
How are the default routes defined: using the next hop or using local interface?? In case of local interface they will not flush out even if the interface is down. In case of next hop it should. Chirag Arora -Original Message- From: Poulin, Darnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursd

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-19 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 10:27 AM 6/19/2003 +, Chirag Arora wrote: >How are the default routes defined: using the next hop or using local >interface?? In case of local interface they will not flush out even if the >interface is down. In case of next hop it should. IMHO the route should be removed even if it's point

Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-20 Thread Troy Leliard
> -Original Message- > From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914] > > > At 10:27 AM 6/19/2003 +, Chirag Arora wrote: > >>How are t

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-20 Thread Poulin, Darnell
- From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914] At 10:27 AM 6/19/2003 +, Chirag Arora wrote: >How are the default routes defined: using the next hop or using local >interface??

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-20 Thread Lupi, Guy
11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914] Using a next hop of an interface or IP address does have slightly different behaviour. Using an interface as the next hop actually giev the route an AD of 0 (ie a directly connected route), while that pointing to an IP ha

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-20 Thread Zsombor Papp
achable. > We are using ver 12 of the IOS. An IOS version looks something like this: 12.2(17.1)S Thanks, Zsombor >-Original Message- >From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Multiple D

Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-20 Thread Zsombor Papp
the IOS. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914] > > > > > > At 10:27 AM 6/19/2

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-20 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
ce; he still worked for Cisco when we had the exchange. > > >-Original Message- >From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:24 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914] > >Using a next hop of an int

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-20 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
ce; he still worked for Cisco when we had the exchange. > > >-Original Message- >From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:24 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914] > >Using a next hop of an int

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

2003-06-21 Thread Daniel Cotts
12.2 and found the AD to be one for all. > -Original Message- > From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914] > > > At 4:25 PM + 6/20/03, Lupi, G