You might wanna check this link .
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk80/technologies_tech_note09186a0
0800ef7b2.shtml
Thanks,
Srivathsan A
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Poulin, Darnell
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:48 PM
To: [EM
How are the default routes defined: using the next hop or using local
interface?? In case of local interface they will not flush out even if the
interface is down. In case of next hop it should.
Chirag Arora
-Original Message-
From: Poulin, Darnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursd
At 10:27 AM 6/19/2003 +, Chirag Arora wrote:
>How are the default routes defined: using the next hop or using local
>interface?? In case of local interface they will not flush out even if the
>interface is down. In case of next hop it should.
IMHO the route should be removed even if it's point
> -Original Message-
> From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]
>
>
> At 10:27 AM 6/19/2003 +, Chirag Arora wrote:
>
>>How are t
-
From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]
At 10:27 AM 6/19/2003 +, Chirag Arora wrote:
>How are the default routes defined: using the next hop or using local
>interface??
11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]
Using a next hop of an interface or IP address does have slightly
different behaviour. Using an interface as the next hop actually giev
the route an AD of 0 (ie a directly connected route), while that
pointing to an IP ha
achable.
> We are using ver 12 of the IOS.
An IOS version looks something like this: 12.2(17.1)S
Thanks,
Zsombor
>-Original Message-
>From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Multiple D
the IOS.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:42 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]
> >
> >
> > At 10:27 AM 6/19/2
ce; he still worked for
Cisco when we had the exchange.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:24 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]
>
>Using a next hop of an int
ce; he still worked for
Cisco when we had the exchange.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:24 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]
>
>Using a next hop of an int
12.2 and found the AD to be one for all.
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]
>
>
> At 4:25 PM + 6/20/03, Lupi, G
11 matches
Mail list logo