below the predefined load.
Any input would be appreciated. Thanks.
Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Vijay Ramcharan
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multiple T1's
In this sc
I am doing exactly the same thing using MPPP and Virtual interfaces. Here's
how the config looks:
multilink virtual-template 1
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
no ip mroute-cache
no fair-queue
ppp multilink
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
no ip mr
second
line when usage on the primary line drops below the predefined load.
Any input would be appreciated. Thanks.
Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Vijay Ramcharan
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multiple T1's
At 02:12 PM 3/20/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>If you are running EIGRP as your routing protocol, it wi
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Brian
>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:57 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Multiple T1's
>
>
>On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
>
> Bri
>"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PR
. If you want per packet load balancing, disable caching.
No multilink PPP required.
Bri
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Lemagie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: Multiple T1's
> If yo
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple T1's
On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
Bri
"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]&qu
You may also find that you have turn off fast switching in order for the
load to be balanced packet by packet.
""Jason Stephens"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to a
more precisely, out both serial interfaces..
Brian
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998nrc$3h8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998nrc$3h8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
>
> Bri
> "Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in mess
On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
Bri
"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to another office.
We
> want these 2 t1's to not
> o
10 matches
Mail list logo