RE: Multiple T1's

2001-03-21 Thread David A. Lauer
below the predefined load. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks. Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vijay Ramcharan Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multiple T1's In this sc

Re: Multiple T1's

2001-03-21 Thread mike
I am doing exactly the same thing using MPPP and Virtual interfaces. Here's how the config looks: multilink virtual-template 1 interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation ppp no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ppp multilink interface Serial0/1 no ip address encapsulation ppp no ip mr

Re: Multiple T1's

2001-03-21 Thread John Neiberger
second line when usage on the primary line drops below the predefined load. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks. Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vijay Ramcharan Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Multiple T1's

2001-03-20 Thread Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multiple T1's At 02:12 PM 3/20/2001 -0800, you wrote: >If you are running EIGRP as your routing protocol, it wi

RE: Multiple T1's

2001-03-20 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Brian >Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:57 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Multiple T1's > > >On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces. > > Bri >"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PR

Re: Multiple T1's

2001-03-20 Thread Brian
. If you want per packet load balancing, disable caching. No multilink PPP required. Bri - Original Message - From: "Chris Lemagie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Multiple T1's > If yo

RE: Multiple T1's

2001-03-20 Thread Chris Lemagie
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multiple T1's On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces. Bri "Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]&qu

Re: Multiple T1's

2001-03-20 Thread James Haynes
You may also find that you have turn off fast switching in order for the load to be balanced packet by packet. ""Jason Stephens"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to a

Re: Multiple T1's

2001-03-20 Thread Brian
more precisely, out both serial interfaces.. Brian "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 998nrc$3h8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998nrc$3h8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces. > > Bri > "Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in mess

Re: Multiple T1's

2001-03-20 Thread Brian
On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces. Bri "Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to another office. We > want these 2 t1's to not > o