>Let me state first of al that I do not know the genesis of this question. It
>originated on another news group, and there were a number of responses that
>stated "use virtual links"
There is no general solution to solving partitioned nonzero areas in
OSPF. That being said, there are some hacks
Let me state first of al that I do not know the genesis of this question. It
originated on another news group, and there were a number of responses that
stated "use virtual links"
I thought about the implication of the question, and asked myself "in OSPF,
do areas have to have unique numbers?" T
Title: RE: OSPF question - discontiguous areas
Is this can be fixed changing one of the Area_2 to another area such as Area_3?
-Singh
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 9:52 PM
To: Cisco Mail List
Subject: OSPF question
Hi!
Change one of the area number from 2 to something else expect 0.
> This question came up on another list. I thought I would repeat it here,
and
> see what kind of discussion it engenders.
>
> Question: how does one repair a discontiguous OSPF area?
>
> e.g. Area_2-Area_0-
Would the answer be "use a virtual link"?
Just guessing.
David
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:52 PM
To: Cisco Mail List
Subject:OSPF question - discontiguous areas
This question came up on anothe
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> This question came up on another list. I thought I would repeat it here, and
> see what kind of discussion it engenders.
>
> Question: how does one repair a discontiguous OSPF area?
>
> e.g. Area_2-Area_0---Area_2
>
I would i
Right off the bat, I would say change one of the areas to Area 51 and
be done with it. ;-) It is typically not hard to change the area.
_ESPECIALLY_ with the fact it is already attached to the Backbone!
My understanding, and a quick search at my 2nd favorite search engine,
only showed virtual-l
7 matches
Mail list logo
