that currently offers these services.
C.Q.Nguyen
Former Qwest VPN Employee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter van Oene
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Anyone using Qwest PRN ? [7:72704]
At 07:58
At 07:58 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
>I think this actually is an MPLS VPN, of sorts. It's been fairly hard for me
>to get the nitty gritty details. As I see it, it's a layer 3 MPLS vpn with
>OSPF as our 'interface' to their network but I may be wrong about that.
This sounds exactly
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think this actually is an MPLS VPN, of sorts. It's been fairly hard for
me
> to get the nitty gritty details. As I see it, it's a layer 3 MPLS vpn with
> OSPF as our 'interface' to their network but I may be wrong about that.
>
> As so
Peter van Oene 7/21/03 3:26:30 PM >>>
>>Oops. Accidentally hit post before adding any content. ;-)
>>
>>Yes, it stands for Private Routed Network. It's a very interesting
solution.
>>Our hub sites would participate in OSPF with their network, while our
spoke
>>sites would use static routing.
>Oops. Accidentally hit post before adding any content. ;-)
>
>Yes, it stands for Private Routed Network. It's a very interesting solution.
>Our hub sites would participate in OSPF with their network, while our spoke
>sites would use static routing. The PRN would have static routes pointing to
>ou
ving it to an SBC
internet line in the near future due to the high MRC on the Qwest line.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Anyone using Qwest PRN ? [7:72704]
Peter van Oene wrote:
I think this actually is an MPLS VPN, of sorts. It's been fairly hard for me
to get the nitty gritty details. As I see it, it's a layer 3 MPLS vpn with
OSPF as our 'interface' to their network but I may be wrong about that.
As someone else just mentioned, this service is expensive compared to fram
so, John, whatever happened to the MPLS network they were trying to sell you
a while back? what advantage does PRN have vis a vis MPLS such that Quest is
no longer trying to convince you to buy it?
inquiring minds need to know :->
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Pet
Peter van Oene wrote:
>
> At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
> >Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions
> for you:
> >
> >1. How do you like it so far?
> >2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the
> migration go?
> >3. Any 'gotchas' that you l
Peter van Oene wrote:
>
> At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
> >Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions
> for you:
> >
> >1. How do you like it so far?
> >2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the
> migration go?
> >3. Any 'gotchas' that you l
At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
>Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions for you:
>
>1. How do you like it so far?
>2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the migration go?
>3. Any 'gotchas' that you learned later that you wish you'd learned
11 matches
Mail list logo
