Should that happen we had best all have contingency plans in place to share
information - think POTS and fax. Cisco will have to have a way to get info
and IOS updates out to customers. Maybe a "BIG" CD burner and FedEx
delivery.
> -Original Message-
> From: "Chuck Whose Road is Ever Short
thorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:26 PM
&g
e because of software bugs.
Why is software so hard to get right? Well, I know why. But this has
gotta
change
Priscilla
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> TJ
> ... not all windows admin's are incompetent
> ... and some are network admins as well :)
>
t: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Microsoft worm [7:74045]
Evans, Timothy R (BearingPoint) wrote:
>
> I know of several organizations in the Washington / NoVa / MD
> area that were
> effected - the MD Motor Vehicle Administration was offline for
stupid bug, but benign. A lot of the infamous worms of the
> past
> spread unintentionally like wildfire because of software bugs.
>
> Why is software so hard to get right? Well, I know why. But this has
> gotta
> change
>
> Priscilla
>
> >
> >
.
Why is software so hard to get right? Well, I know why. But this has gotta
change
Priscilla
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> TJ
> ... not all windows admin's are incompetent
> ... and some are network admins as well :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Reimer
on
their network by attempting to mitigate it incorrectly :)
Thanks!
TJ
.. not all windows admin's are incompetent
.. and some are network admins as well :)
-Original Message-
From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT Microsoft worm [7:74045]
""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For reasons of confidentiality I won't and can't name any names, but I am
&
""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For reasons of confidentiality I won't and can't name any names, but I am
> aware of several hospitals that were affected pretty seriously. Everyone
> here knows that Cisco Call Manager runs on Windows, so imagine what
happens
> to your e
On the network side, the day of the notice, we issued a constant scan of
PC's on our Snort box. We were scanning machines attempting to make
constant connections on port 69, 135, and . We found none.
Fortunately, our windows admins came in early, updated our trend server with
the virus defini
ginal Message-
> From: annlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 1:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT Microsoft worm [7:74045]
>
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > Just wondering, is this new LOVSAN msblast worm as big as
> it se
For reasons of confidentiality I won't and can't name any names, but I am
aware of several hospitals that were affected pretty seriously. Everyone
here knows that Cisco Call Manager runs on Windows, so imagine what happens
to your entire phone infrastructure if you are running VoIP. Network grind
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Just wondering, is this new LOVSAN msblast worm as big as it seems to be?
> I've been helping lots of Windows users clean up their machines. They all
> had the worm. These are mostly home users. I can't believe they would use
> broadband, "always-on" access and not ha
13 matches
Mail list logo