RE: PIX without NAT. [7:48593]

2002-07-12 Thread Ufuk Yasibeyli
Hi again, I am sorry for mixing up. Yes, I assumed nat command and static is indeed a NAT. Regards, Ufuk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B|lent ^ahin Sent: 12 Temmuz 2002 Cuma 13:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX without

RE: PIX without NAT. [7:48593]

2002-07-12 Thread Bülent Şahin
", an address translantion definition from "10.10.10.2" to "10.10.10.2" can be created. Bulent -Original Message- From: Ufuk Yasibeyli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX without NAT. [7:48593]

RE: PIX without NAT. [7:48593]

2002-07-12 Thread Ufuk Yasibeyli
ginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B|lent ^ahin Sent: 12 Temmuz 2002 Cuma 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX without NAT. [7:48593] Hi, I tried it before. Without NAT it didn't work, but you can do it using NAT; translating IP

RE: PIX without NAT. [7:48593]

2002-07-12 Thread Bülent Şahin
Hi, I tried it before. Without NAT it didn't work, but you can do it using NAT; translating IP address to the same IP address. I suppose it's related to stateful inspection. Bulent -Original Message- From: Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:27 PM T