Re: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-27 Thread Nick S.
Michael Williams wrote: > Do you have some good links to info about the inner workings of > TACACS+? I'd like to read more about exactly how it works. Unfor. I couldnt find much on the CCO, but I did find some good info in MCNS book (cisco press). > As far as the HSRP, I guess at this point we

RE: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-26 Thread Dennis Laganiere
Wednesday, December 26, 2001 3:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems [7:30079] In Tacacs+ only the body of the packet is encrypted (not the header). And the Interfaces supported by FastEtherchannel can be from 2 to 8 (so 6 is correct) but Etherchannel offers its own failover mechanism where

Re: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-26 Thread Michael Williams
Nick S. wrote: > In Tacacs+ only the body of the packet is encrypted (not the > header). And the Interfaces supported by FastEtherchannel can > be from 2 to 8 (so 6 is correct) but Etherchannel offers its > own failover mechanism whereby failure of one or more channel > doesnt bring the whole ethe

Re: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-26 Thread c1sc0k1d
Sure enough, I just looked it up and it does support up to 8 ports. I don't know where I was getting 4 from. Maybe an older IOS version or something. Thanks for pointing that out. The k1d ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I could be mistake

Re: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-26 Thread Nick S.
In Tacacs+ only the body of the packet is encrypted (not the header). And the Interfaces supported by FastEtherchannel can be from 2 to 8 (so 6 is correct) but Etherchannel offers its own failover mechanism whereby failure of one or more channel doesnt bring the whole etherchannel down, but it wor

Re: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-25 Thread Scottie @ PacBell
FastEther Channel will support 4 interfaces - Original Message - From: "Ellis Lam" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 4:55 AM Subject: Problems [7:30079] > What is the feature that NOT included in Fastether Channel ? > > A. Up to 6 interfaces can be bundled into one prot-channel > B.

RE: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-25 Thread Michael Williams
I could be mistaken, but I think I've seen somethings that support up to 8 interfaces in an etherchannel bundle. From URL: (watch for wrap) http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/lan_switching/6.html "Some cards and platforms also support Gigabit EtherChannel and have the ability to use from two t

Re: Problems [7:30079]

2001-12-25 Thread c1sc0k1d
AFAIK, you are correct. The models I have worked with only support up to 4 ports per group. The k1d ""Ellis Lam"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What is the feature that NOT included in Fastether Channel ? > > A. Up to 6 interfaces can be bundled into one prot