TECTED]>
> >To: "Fred Danson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Question about Napt
> >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:33:35 +0100
> >
> >Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article.
> >I'll
> Hi, I was reading RFC3022 about Napt last night, and I still dont
>understand one thing about it. From what I understand is that Napt allows
>you to use one single globally unique IP address on the WAN interface of
>your router, and then a large number of local addresses inside your network
would occur here)
Transport (NAT or PAT occur here)
Network
DataLink
Physical
-Original Message-
From: Fred Danson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question about Napt
If the host is using the same port for 2
If the host is using the same port for 2 different applications, wouldn't
the applications get confused? Dont the applications need 2 different
streams of traffic going with 2 different ports?
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Quest
ROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Question about Napt
>Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:33:35 +0100
>
>Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article.
>I'll be watching while this also has my interest.
>
>http://www.cisco.com/war
Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article.
I'll be watching while this also has my interest.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_3-4/ipj_3-4_nat.html
Quote:
The Cisco Secure PIX Firewall series supports port address translation (PAT)
with "port-level multiple
6 matches
Mail list logo