RE: Question about Napt

2001-01-25 Thread kent . hundley
TECTED]> > >To: "Fred Danson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: Question about Napt > >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:33:35 +0100 > > > >Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article. > >I'll

Re: Question about Napt

2001-01-25 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
> Hi, I was reading RFC3022 about Napt last night, and I still dont >understand one thing about it. From what I understand is that Napt allows >you to use one single globally unique IP address on the WAN interface of >your router, and then a large number of local addresses inside your network

RE: Question about Napt

2001-01-25 Thread dwhitley
would occur here) Transport (NAT or PAT occur here) Network DataLink Physical -Original Message- From: Fred Danson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question about Napt If the host is using the same port for 2

RE: Question about Napt

2001-01-25 Thread Fred Danson
If the host is using the same port for 2 different applications, wouldn't the applications get confused? Dont the applications need 2 different streams of traffic going with 2 different ports? >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Quest

RE: Question about Napt

2001-01-25 Thread Fred Danson
ROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Question about Napt >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:33:35 +0100 > >Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article. >I'll be watching while this also has my interest. > >http://www.cisco.com/war

RE: Question about Napt

2001-01-25 Thread mjans001
Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article. I'll be watching while this also has my interest. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_3-4/ipj_3-4_nat.html Quote: The Cisco Secure PIX Firewall series supports port address translation (PAT) with "port-level multiple