""John Neiberger"" wrote in message ...
> I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since
> I'm researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive
> answer from them but it appears that their PRN service is 2764-based,
> which apparently means it does not use MPLS like 2547
hey, John, I understand there is an update to RFC 2549, due out Real Soon
Now, which might help you out here.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm
> researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definiti
John Neiberger wrote:
> I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm
> researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive answer from them
> but it appears that their PRN service is 2764-based, which apparently means
> it does not use MPLS like 2547-based VPNs. I'm c
passport at heart an ATM switch/
Passport is FR.
-Nakul
""annlee"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John Neiberger wrote:
>
> > I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm
> > researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive answer from
them
Nakul Malik wrote:
> passport at heart an ATM switch/
>
> Passport is FR.
>
> -Nakul
>
>
>
> ""annlee"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>John Neiberger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm
>>>researching Qwest's PRN service.
At 2:22 PM + 7/26/03, Nakul Malik wrote:
>passport at heart an ATM switch/
>
>Passport is FR.
>
>-Nakul
The Passport is internally a cell switch, onto which Nortel has
overlaid a great many other features. Before I went to work for
Nortel, I consulted on the BGP implementation, an
cipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Nakul Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: R
dre wrote:
>
> I, personally, do not want to get heavily into it. It's not
> mature
> technology, and it's all bad, IMO. There are a few solid
> technologies...and they are mostly the ones that were
> implemented
> first. Sure, MPLS-VPN with 2547 is great, but it scales
> horribly
> and is diff
>I'm curious if anyone has talked to their SP and has thought about
>leveraging MPLS carrier's carrier approach? Not sure how many
>SPs, if any, support this currently, but seems to have the
>right scaling properties if you're an ISP. And with the ability
>for eBGP to carry labels for BGP routes
Thanks Anlee.
I used to work for GTL a while back and they told us that passport was at
heart running on FR. When i say passport, i refer to 6480/7480 etc., not
8600, which most people, including me still refer to as Accelar.
I agree with u on the backplane statement though. Everything happens thru
At 5:55 AM + 7/27/03, Nakul Malik wrote:
>Thanks Anlee.
>I used to work for GTL a while back and they told us that passport was at
>heart running on FR. When i say passport, i refer to 6480/7480 etc., not
>8600, which most people, including me still refer to as Accelar.
>I agree with u on the b
>Also worth looking at is the hardware component: what will run on
>the hardware you've already got (if anything)? IF you already
>have most or all of the hardware pieces to implement Cisco's
>version, then Cisco's probably makes sense. IF you already have
>the requisite Nortel gear (Passports?
12 matches
Mail list logo
