ROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
> Paul Werner
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Subject: Re: quick response (help) please
[7:24238]
>
>
> Agreed. While it is possible to supernet class A
> addresses, it is generally impractic
It says 09/12/2001 as the last update.
>>> "Chuck Larrieu" 10/27/01 08:02PM >>>
[snip]
BTW, looking over the allocation table at:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
interesting. anyone know how up to date this is?
Chuck
[snip]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/f
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Paul Werner
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Subject: Re: quick response (help) please [7:24238]
>
>
> Agreed. While it is possible to supernet cl
://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
interesting. anyone know how up to date this is?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Werner
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Subject: Re:
Agreed. While it is possible to supernet class A
addresses, it is generally impractical for the
most part, unless the ISP/AS that is summarizing
two Class A addresses owns both address spaces
(and they are contiguous). I might suspect that
somebody such as UUNet or AOL or Sprint might do
it
5 matches
Mail list logo