Re: Static route load balancing? [7:31715]

2002-01-13 Thread Cisco Breaker
So you are actually saying that some packets will be lost. Can we avoid this with policy-maps or something else? Best regards, Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... doesn't matter. Serial1/0 100.100.100.1 YES manual up up

RE: Static route load balancing? [7:31715]

2002-01-12 Thread Bill Carter
If the static routes have the save metric, the router will load balance traffic it sends out according to the routes. I don't like this option because if one path goes down every other packet will fail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

RE: Static route load balancing? [7:31715]

2002-01-12 Thread Brian Whalen
Doesnt that depend on whether you route to the local interface or the remote ip? Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Bill Carter wrote: If the static routes have the save metric, the router will load balance traffic it sends out according to the

Re: Static route load balancing? [7:31715]

2002-01-12 Thread Chuck Larrieu
doesn't matter. Serial1/0 100.100.100.1 YES manual up up Serial1/1 100.100.13.1YES manual up up r1#ping 10.1.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: .!.!. Success rate is 40 percent (2/5),