Are each of these a class c subnet?
-Original Message-
From: JohnZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2002 04:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
191.72.4.0
191.72.12.0
191.72.21.0
Am I
to summarise you require all your networks to be
contiguous.
hth,
mark.
-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 18:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Are each of these a class c subnet?
-Original
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101.
JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be
summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be
summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he
September 2002 21:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101.
JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be
summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum
ject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101.
JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be
summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be
summarizing additional subne
The configuration you posted will result in a network that looks like the
information below.
SubnetMask Subnet Size Host Range
Broadcast
191.72.0.0 255.255.224.0 8190 191.72.0.1 to
191.72.31.254 191.72.31.255
JohnZ wrote in
Short answer: Yes you are correct.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
JohnZ
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
JohnZ wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
x.x.0001.0
191.72.2.0
x.x.0010.0
191.72.4.0
x.x.0100.0
191.72.12.0
x.x.1100.0
Thanks guys, this answers my question. Chuck I heard you are writing an
article on CertZone about 3550. Is that correct if so I look forward to
reading it. it's very timely.
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my
9 matches
Mail list logo
