RE: TEI & SAPI

2000-07-27 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Taylor, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 4:12 PM To: 'Ole Drews Jensen'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]&#x

RE: TEI & SAPI

2000-07-27 Thread Taylor, Don
Your post made me wonder, so I went a-searchin'. The only thing I was able to find on it that might be somewhat authoritative is the following URL: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/dial_ r/drprt1/drbri.htm Scroll to the bottom of the page and look at the tabl

RE: TEI & SAPI

2000-07-27 Thread Karen . Young
Sent by: cc: nobody@groupsSubject: RE: TEI & SAPI

RE: TEI & SAPI

2000-07-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Layer 3 is not the same as the OSI network layer, though. ISDN has a different protocol stack. It sounds like the writer of the study guide question might have been confused by this gotcha. Your answer of "a unique datalink layer address" is better than the answer in the book of "a unique netw

RE: TEI & SAPI

2000-07-27 Thread Adam Quiggle
Ole, Both you and Priscilla are correct. The TEI and SAPI are part of the layer two addressing for LAPD. This means that for question 14 (Chapter 7, page 247) the correct answer is B. Good catch on your part. Sorry to have taken you off track. I had just recently identified this error as par

RE: TEI & SAPI

2000-07-28 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
k Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Adam Quiggle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 7:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TEI & SAPI Ole, Both you and Priscilla are correct. T