RE: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613]

2002-09-03 Thread Walker, James - Is
Create a 'bridge-group' by issuing the command on the interfaces you want to span. -Original Message- From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613] I have the following

RE: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613]

2002-09-03 Thread Daniel Cotts
How about two PVCs in the ATM? -Original Message- From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613] I have the following problem, I have two locations connected

Re: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613]

2002-09-03 Thread MADMAN
Yes routing will solve the problem. Also the Cisco, or formerly Cisco 8110 supports a larger enet packet size. The problem with the tagged frames is that they look like giants, 1518 bytes. Dave Arni V. Skarphedinsson wrote: I have the following problem, I have two locations connected