, August 05, 2000 7:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VPN 3DES ON 2MB Link with 25XX
Have fiannly gotten around to printing out the IPSec Design Guide published
on the Cisco site.
http://www.cisco.com/cpropart/sync-src/ccstcp/cc/techno/protocol/ipsecur/ips
ec/tech/
watch the word wrap
need a
Robert. Your insight is welcome and
> missed.
>
> Chuck
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Robert Hanley
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 12:06 AM
> To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
ginal Message-
> From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 10:36 AM
> To: Darren Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: VPN 3DES ON 2MB Link with 25XX
>
>
> What are you seeing in the way of CPU usage during business
> hours? Are y
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: VPN 3DES ON 2MB Link with 25XX
Also the hated ones (Nortel) have a fairly good VPN box that seems to work
ok. About the only real problem I have had with it is the interface is GUI
only also they say they are working on a BCR (blatant Cisco rip-off) command
iginal Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Chuck Larrieu
> > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 9:40 AM
> > To: Robert Hanley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: VPN 3DES ON 2MB Link with 25XX
> >
> >
>
To: Robert Hanley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: VPN 3DES ON 2MB Link with 25XX
>
>
> Since this is a Cisco list, Robert, the least you could have done is name
> the Cisco CVPN ( formerly Altiga ) boxes! :->
>
> Say, where you been? Haven't seen your name here in several
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 12:06 AM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: VPN 3DES ON 2MB Link with 25XX
With respect for the fact that this is a cisco list I
would still
With respect for the fact that this is a cisco list I
would still like to point out that it is precisely
because of the cpu intensive nature of crypto that the
most popular solution is not a router per se but a
dedicated VPN box such as the Nortel Contivity.
For the curious:
http://www.nortelnetw
Have fiannly gotten around to printing out the IPSec Design Guide published
on the Cisco site.
http://www.cisco.com/cpropart/sync-src/ccstcp/cc/techno/protocol/ipsecur/ips
ec/tech/
watch the word wrap
need a CCO login to get there
rather interesting publication, with 15 pages on IPSec, 27 pages
Hi Christophe,
The 2500-series routers would *NOT* be capable of performing 3DES processing
with a 2MB link. To put it into perspective, I recently spoke to an engineer
from Cisco and he confirmed that one of the higher end routers, the 3640,
will only perform 3DES encryption at a rate of 512Kbit
Christophe,
The 2M serial link will handle the telnet traffic. All that is sent
during telnet is keyboard and video characters. All processing is done on
the remote machine, therefore there won't be any paging traffic, etc. If
all file & print services are provided locally, then you should
Hi Christophe,
I have been looking into a similar solution except I have 5 branches
accessing ALL their services from the head office and everything needs to
be encrypted. I arranged the establishment of a PVC over fibre for 2 of
the branches to the head office and have setup a router at one of
12 matches
Mail list logo
