True Percilla, but I would rather hire someone who could actually make the switches do
what he knows they can. Also, the BCMSN had around 5 or 6 command questions, so it
wasn't just the CLI that got him... ;)
P.S. Love your book ;)
Mark Z ~ CCNA/DA 1/4-NP
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has bee
No.
(only 300)
Original Message Follows
From: "J K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "J K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cisco switches
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:48:31 GMT
dont you get 400 for typing your ss
And the other 47 was for completing the survey , hahaha
Mark Z...stuff certified...
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/g
I had the test admin help me with the sign-on process.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: J K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: cisco switches
>
> dont you get 400 for typing
er for a
dense-mode network a tad higher in the score count.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: cisco switches
> Yes, but in the real world, I like Duck&#
ednesday, September 13, 2000 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: cisco switches
> No.
>
> (only 300)
>
>
> Original Message Follows
> From: "J K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "J K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to a 1000. Novell pioneered the adaptive testing technique, you people
> should read that to get a clear understanding on adaptive testing.
> Duck
> - Original Message -
> From: Ejay Hire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECT
]; Yee, Jason; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cisco switches
thats not really the vibe I get.
He is studying for CCNP and half way there. I feel he is probably a
little impatient, and asks here instead of referencing, no matter how
simple the question..that seems to piss some off.
I
a switch can do you should be allright.
> > > I just took the switching test and scored a 347 after six weeks of study
> >'m
> > > not too depressed but I got to get back to reading.
> > > Duck
> > > >
> > > > > -----Origi
Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: cisco switches
> Yes, but in the real world, I like Duck's attitude. Basically he's saying
> that he doesn't need to memorize which switch has IO
cat 1900 does not run IOS...
a RSM is needed for all Cat switchs to run IOS, i think
"Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
859B90209E2FD311BE5600902751445D35EFBC@LYNX">news:859B90209E2FD311BE5600902751445D35EFBC@LYNX...
> hi all,
>
> Do all cisco switches run IOS , I know 1900 do , but
In a message dated 9/12/00 10:49:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< hi all,
Do all cisco switches run IOS , I know 1900 do , but what about the others?
Jason
>>
Hey, you've asked a lot of beginner level questions in the past couple months
that could be answered ext
In a message dated 9/12/00 11:08:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< cat 1900 does not run IOS...
a RSM is needed for all Cat switchs to run IOS, i think
>>
Incorrect...the 1900 does in fact have a IOS CLI...and RSM is used for
multilayer switching in a switch...
Mark
4000 series switches use 'set commands' as opposed to router IOS.
Otherwise, you are correct in what you said Mark.
John
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 8:34 PM
RTFM = Read The F#cking Manuals?
LOL
This is a new one to me.
John
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: cisco switches
> In a message dated 9/12/0
t, by all means, keep helping him.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cisco switches
>
>
&
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: cisco switches
>Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:34:51 -0600
>
>I'm surprised Jason is getting so many people on this list helping him
>troubleshoot his day
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Bellanca Smythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 7:34 AM
Subject: RE: cisco switches
> I'm surprised Jason is getting so many people on t
et back to reading.
> Duck
> - Original Message -
> From: Bellanca Smythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 7:34 AM
> Subject: RE: cisco switches
>
>
>
ing him.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: cisco switches
> &g
Thank you for saying that for me!!! ;) I almost forgot about him. I studied a week
less than him and got an OK 803 on Monday... Attitude counts!!!
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
__
Thank you for saying that for me!!! ;) I almost forgot about him. I studied a week
less than him and got an OK 803 on Monday... Attitude counts!!!
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
__
y all means, keep helping him.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:34 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
dont you get 400 for typing your ssn in correcly and sitting in the right
sylvan seat . Ah Who Cares !
>From: "Neil Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: cisco swi
ginal Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:34 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: cisco sw
m: "Neil Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: cisco switches
> >Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:25:54 -0400
> >
> >Possibly your "who cares!" atti
> > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:34 PM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL P
Thanks Ross/Richard,
Some useful documents found with their search engine. I'll hopefully get to
try the suggestions out this week.
Regards,
Bikespace
""Richard Botham"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bikespace,
> Just spent a day testing exactly this...spooky
>
> You're correct ,
Have you checked on Stonebeat's site? They have a number of articles
relating to Cisco equipment and Stonebeat depending on the equipment involved.
In particular,
http://www.stonesoft.com/estone/support/knowledgebase/view.html?id=000475&q=cisco
HTH
Bikespace wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Anybod
Bikespace,
Just spent a day testing exactly this...spooky
You're correct , Cisco's cannot put a multicast mac in its arp cache
dynamically - BUT - you CAN put STATIC ARP entries in a Cisco pointing to a
multicast mac.( Even if Layer3 is unicast)
However there are some small perfomance points here
Have you tried a different NIC?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco switches and laptops [7:56731]
I was wondering if anyone has experienced the same issues as we are
hav
Barry,
not sure what you mean with 'it won't let go of their ip address from the
last site they were at', but maybe this helps you:
Troubleshooting Cisco Catalyst Switches to NIC Compatibility Issues
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html
Regards
Reinhold
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 02:45
Remember - you may not be saving money by buying less expensive hardware
with the same functionality. You need to factor in the support available,
the reliability of the hardware, the uprgadeability, managability, etc.,
etc. You may save several hundred dollars on a switch but that does not add
It really depends on your envioronment and applications.
If you need just closet switch, HP will do it. I have worked with Procurves,
no problems with them at
all. You can save good money on HP switches and
they have lifetime warranty.
Inamul
""Bruce Seelinger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in mess
Interesting that you brought the differance in the ARP timers up. I
have seen some weird problems in a couple of network, things were not
breaking but would see strange traffic, packets getting dropped etc.
Bumped up the CAM timers on the Cat to match the routers, 14400.
http://www.cisco.com/
I am assuming the switch/msfc is not running native ios..
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cisco switches
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> MADMAN
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cisco switches (with MSFC) arp timer question [7:38635]
>
> Interesting that you brought the differance in the ARP timers up. I
> have
For step 3, it depends whether the link between core 1 and core 2 is a
routed link or a trunk (ISL or 802.1Q) link. If its a routed link (such as
VLAN 3, with all VLANs running OSPF), core 1 will route the packet to core 2
and core 2 will route the packet to client 2.
For step 4, client 2 will no
38 matches
Mail list logo
