, but
they assume you will be using the more secure ssh.
Paul Borghese
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Low"
To:
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:31 AM
Subject: RE: connectivity problem [7:8664]
> Unfortunately, there is no hosts.deny / hosts.allow file. Tcpwarpper is
not
>
Unfortunately, there is no hosts.deny / hosts.allow file. Tcpwarpper is not
enable on that machine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Andy Low
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: connectivity problem [7:8664
> >From the message below, I still can't figure out which refuse which
machine
> and why?
> Jun 14 16:06:34 titan [EMAIL PROTECTED][16621]: warning: can't
> verify hostname: getaddrinfo(68-202.xxx.com) failed: no address
> associated with hostname
That's not a connectivity problem. Look at /etc/
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> Good points. When people first start looking at products, they must
> realize that terminology varies from vendor to vendor, and even
> within a vendors, the product designs represent responses to
> perceived market needs, not necessarily spec
MAIL PROTECTED]> on 13/07/2000 11:12:56
>
>Please respond to Omar Khawaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
>Subject: Re: connectivity problem
>
>
>
>hubs usually don't have NICs for their ports. they are
/CSDA on 14/07/2000 15:31
---
Omar Khawaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 13/07/2000 11:12:56
Please respond to Omar Khawaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject: Re: connectivity problem
hubs usually don
IL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:53 PM
> Subject: RE: connectivity problem
>
> >
> >The ARP cache should contain all MAC addresses for the port you have the
> hub
> >connected to. So for the sake of arguement, you have 6 work
host.
So does this mean that all hosts also have NICs?
Dick Silva
-Original Message-
From: Chris H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 200
;
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:53 PM
Subject: RE: connectivity problem
>
>The ARP cache should contain all MAC addresses for the port you have the
hub
>connected to. So for the sake of arguement, you have 6 workstations
>connected to that hub, the switch should cache 7 MAC addres
nk port or
what, but you may want to check the hub itself.
Chris
>From: Daniel Cotts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Daniel Cotts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Don Dettmore'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: connectivity problem
Maybe a layer one problem?
Seems that the switch can see the hub. The hub can't see the switch. Do you
have link both ends? Have you substituted the patch cable between them?
Alternatively do you have a packet analyzer such as EtherPeek to stick in
the hub to see if it sees the pings, arp requests
could this happen because you have to use a crossover cable between the hub
and the switch ?
or
are there any VLANs on the catalyst ?
---
Gabriel Neagoe, GN379-RIPE
Networking solutions consultant
Cisco product manager, CCNA, CCDA
S&T Romania
tel: +401
The Problem may be the Cable or Crimping. The Switch may Expect two Pairs.
The LED will glow even one pair is correct. Check the Connectivity by
changing the Cable.
Regards
siddiqu.T
--
T. Mohamed Abubakkar Siddiqu CCNA
"Don Dettmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is an intere
Hey Don,
Interesting problem.. Have you tried clearing the arp cache on the 2924? I
assume that the hosts connected to the hub are in the same subnet as the
ones on the switch? Any Vlans setup on the switch? Any access-lists setup?
Finally, have you tried erasing the config and starting from s
14 matches
Mail list logo
