Scott,
I think you have a great point, it seems that most of the computer
technologies we have today are not taken full advantage of. However
instead of taking the air out the sale's staff sales as it were ( no pun
intended ). Why not suggest upgrade from the Idf's to the server farm.
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: is 10baseT dead? [7:65077]
Scott,
I think you have a great point, it seems that most of the computer
technologies we have today are not taken full advantage of. However
instead of taking the air out the sale's
as the server can
put out.
Having a slower line to the client in effect will cause
degradation at the
server.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Aiello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: is 10baseT dead? [7:65077
A lot of switches these days have gig ports, and most servers ship with
gig cards, so where it used to be 10 at the desktop and 100 at the
server, it is moving to 100 at the desk and gig at the server (or at
least, etherchannel 4 nic's for high load servers).
I agree with you in some respects.
You're correct that many users don't need 100Mbit to fully
function. However, I think you need to look at things from a different
perspective:
The current cost of 100Mbit is in many cases the same as 10Mbit, and in
some cases is even cheaper due to production demand. The cost of 1Gbit is
5 matches
Mail list logo
