RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-12 Thread Stull, Cory
AM To: 'Flem'; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit? can't catch what you are trying to say Jason -Original Message- From: Flem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:48 PM To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail

RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-12 Thread Yee, Jason
thanks -Original Message- From: Stull, Cory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 11:05 PM To: Yee, Jason; 'Flem'; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit? I'm not sure what setting the frame-relay keepalive to 0 would do

RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-10 Thread Yee, Jason
it's a receive-only dish the customer has a terrestrial link for the return path Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame

RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-10 Thread Yee, Jason
thank you very much your explanation is crystal clear -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit? 10 seconds

RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Yee, Jason
can't catch what you are trying to say Jason -Original Message- From: Flem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:48 PM To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit? Yee , inline . --- "Yee, Jason&qu

Re: [keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?]

2000-10-09 Thread fathar
Yeahh,, Thats 100 % Right Faisal. "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi anyone knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit straight away went up ie line protocol is up I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it right?

Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Flem
Yee , inline . --- "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi anyone knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit straight away went up ie line protocol is up I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it right? Keep-alives

Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 9 Oct 2000 01:54:14 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :hi anyone : :knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit :straight away went up ie line protocol is up The keepalive setting on a frame-relay interface determines the LMI interval. Turning it off

RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Yee, Jason
: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit? On 9 Oct 2000 01:54:14 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :hi anyone : :knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit :straight away went up ie line protocol is up The keepalive setting on a frame-relay interface

RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Yee, Jason
] Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit? On 9 Oct 2000 20:58:12 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :if that is the case setting keepalives to what value is optimal? : :10 , I tried setting it to 10 but it went down To what, if anything, is this interface physically connected