Re: Output queue drops [7:74709]

2003-09-03 Thread Pat Donlon
I'm not really that worried but the rs machine reported a few errors when this occurred so it'll keep the sysadmin happy if I can prevent output drops. Ye the network's certainly running better now that windoze has been patched up (again) Cheers Pat MADMAN wrote: > > 66 drops out of 153 bil

Re: Output queue drops [7:74709]

2003-09-03 Thread MADMAN
66 drops out of 153 billion bytes and since the counters have never been cleared this number could have wrapped. I think if your worried about this your network is running quite well;) You can always make the queue a little larger but don't go overboard. Dave Pat Donlon wrote: >Hi All >

Re: Output queue drops [7:74709]

2003-09-03 Thread Johnny Routin
There's a big page devoted to it on CCO... don't have the link handy but it's not hard to find. -- Johnny Routin ""Pat Donlon"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi All > > just wondered if anyone has any useful experience or links on > troubleshooting output queue drops on interface.

Re: Output Queue Drops [7:26363]

2001-11-15 Thread John McCartney
We don't use WFQ on our FE, so can anything be done to stop these pings or the frequency of them? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26371&t=26363 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com

Re: Output Queue Drops [7:26363]

2001-11-15 Thread Allen May
Many games these days do constant ping times. Quake style games give constant ping times on the screen. If they added a Quake style server then it definitely takes pings from users connected. - Original Message - From: John McCartney To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:43 AM Subje

Re: Output Queue Drops [7:26363]

2001-11-15 Thread John Neiberger
My suggestion would be to turn off WFQ. I don't believe it's recommended on really high speed interfaces. I think FIFO is a better option for a FastEthernet link and I've read that WFQ in that situation can actually cause some performance degradation. Do you have a need for weighted queueing on

Re: output queue drops

2000-09-22 Thread Charles Ryan
Shawn, Looks like you need more bandwidthtake a look at the load on the interface (224/255). This circuit is pretty much maxed out. I see your BW is set for 768kbmight look into going all the way with a full T1. Also, you can try changing your queueing from FIFO to WFQ (weighted-fair queu

Re: output queue drops

2000-09-21 Thread Michael Fountain
Look at your load - 224/255 And that is a five-minute average. It looks like this link is pretty much maxed out. You are getting queue drops because you don't have enough wire speed for all of the traffic you are trying to push out. You can increase your queue depth to have it hold more pack

Re: output queue drops

2000-09-21 Thread Ejay Hire
Looking at the LOAD value (first line), your Serial line is at 88% utilization (assuming the bandwidth parameter is correct and this is a 768K line). If the processor on the router isn't overloaded, then I would turn on TCP header compression and Stac software compression. Additionally, you

RE: output queue drops

2000-09-21 Thread Omar Baceski
well, if you look at the load meter, it is clear that it is a very congested line (over 87% last five minutes). if you got peeks of 100% of utli. the rest of the packets will drop until the load descends below the bandwidht the line can handle. 2 solutions: 1- use some sort of queuing for the to c