PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 6:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: redundant MSFC synchronization problem [7:12360]
>
>
> It's possible to run the MSFCs 2 ways.. in High Avail (under the
Hybrid
> CatOS/IOS) you need to enable the high system avail
Michael,
Could you point me to documentation regarding the "native ios" option you
used. Thanks!
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: redundant MSFC synchronizati
It's possible to run the MSFCs 2 ways.. in High Avail (under the Hybrid
CatOS/IOS) you need to enable the high system availability on the CatOS side
then configure the 2 MSFCs with HSRP. Otherwise, you have to make those
changes to both MSFCs manually (AFAIK).
That's why it's advantageous to
I went around about this with Cisco for some time. I made them change
their docs. See the line: "Caution Dual MSFCs in a single chassis are
designed to be used in redundant mode only and you must configure both
MSFCs identically; they must have the exact same configuration. Table
22-2 summariz
Thanks for the info.
However as of now I am not looking for the high availability option. The
current problem is that the second subnet (192.168.2.0) cannot access any
other subnet other than the directly connected subnets. (since this subnet
uses the MSFC2 as the primary module).
The only way
You need at least 12.1(3a)E4 for high availabilty on the MSFC's.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/tech/hafc6_wp.htm
Jeff
""cisco_fun"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
>
> I am facing a weird problem with the redundant MSFC card.
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
