Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-07 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Ooops. Sorry. Brain damage. ;-) Priscilla At 10:47 PM 1/6/02, Tom Lisa wrote: Priscilla, You MUST have been in a hurry, 0 means match this bit position and 1 means don't care. Definately can't argue with your second paragraph though. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-06 Thread Tom Lisa
Priscilla, You MUST have been in a hurry, 0 means match this bit position and 1 means don't care. Definately can't argue with your second paragraph though. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Have you put

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Shengtao
I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Gaz
You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Hunt Lee
Thanks for the response guys :) But can anyone explain to me how do you guys derive: 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be placed in the fourth octet? I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance. Best

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Have you put the addresses and masks in binary and tried to work it out for yourself? In the mask, 0 means don't care and 1 means must match. This is a quick answer due to a shortage of time and because I think you will learn best if you do it yourself. Priscilla At 05:38 PM 1/5/02, Hunt Lee

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Brian Whalen
The first entry, by ending in .7, allows for 10.10.10.40-47, remember this is a span of 8. Then you need 48 and 49, hence the .1. The .40 and .48 are network addresses, I'll refer you to one of the many subnet calculators out there if thinking in binary is not yet second nature. Brian Sonic

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread D. J. Jones
Think of it in the same terms as you would a normal subnet mask Lee. You want to permit address 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.49. 10.10.10.40 255.255.255.248 is equal to 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 and includes the addresses 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.47. Furthermore, 10.10.10.48 255.255.255.254 is equal to

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Hunt Lee
Ok - here's what I understand so far: to permit range only 10.10.10.40 - 10.10.10.49 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 1 1 40 1 1 1 41 1 1 1 0 42 1

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Gaz
Hunt, There are two schools of thought (at least). One of them involves thinking in binary, which I think is the more difficult, but depends how your mind works. I can work it out in binary on paper, but my head goes slower than the pen, so I use the second (and quickest) method: For the second

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-04 Thread Godswill HO
Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses