]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 8:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Ethernet switching
At 04:32 PM 1/31/01, Fred Danson wrote:
Ok, now from my understanding, each port on a switch is its own collision
domain. As far as broadcast domains go, if
Depends on the subnet mask you are using, for instance
142.102.3.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0
142.102.2.1 also with a subnet of 255.255.0.0
The 2.1 and 3.1 would be on the same subnet, however if you have a different
subnet mask I don't think it would work.
Joey
-Original
-
From: Fowler, Joey
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/31/01 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: Ethernet switching
Depends on the subnet mask you are using, for instance
142.102.3.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0
142.102.2.1 also with a subnet of 255.255.0.0
The 2.1 and 3.1 would be on the same subnet, however
and still get a ping response
Kane
- Original Message -
From: "Sheahan, Ryan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Fowler, Joey '" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:23 AM
Subject: RE: Ethernet switching
These are my thoughts,
Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Ethernet switching
In this scenario , it would also not matter what ip address you assigned
to
the stations . ie: you could set one at 10.x.x.x /8 and the other at
192.x.x.x/28 and still get a ping response
Kane
- Original Message -
TECTED],"'Fowler, Joey '"
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ethernet switching
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:08:09 +1300
- Original Message -
From: "Sheahan, Ryan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Fowler, Joey '" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROT
, Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:24 AM
To: 'Fowler, Joey '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Subject: RE: Ethernet switching
These are my thoughts,
If the switch was right out of the box, the stations could ping each
other
no matter what subnet mask you were using. The reason being, they are
located
t: 1/31/01 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: Ethernet switching
Depends on the subnet mask you are using, for instance
142.102.3.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0
142.102.2.1 also with a subnet of 255.255.0.0
The 2.1 and 3.1 would be on the same subnet, however if you have a
different
subnet mask I d
8 matches
Mail list logo