We currently have 4006's SupII in our closets and they have no trouble
handling the traffic (240 ports). If you want to go IOS you can move up to
the SupIII engine on this unit. They interface with our 6513's via gig
uplinks and to date we have not had any issues with the 4006's or the gig
upli
ement.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]
We currently have 4006's SupII in our closets and they have no trouble
handling the traffic (240 ports). I
If you go with the 4000 the supIII is going to give you much more
performance, forwarding 48Mpps as opposed to 18 with the supI and II and
if you ever decide you want layer 3 it's ready.
I definately wouldn't invest in gig interfaces on a 5500.
Dave
Michael Williams wrote:
>
> We are going
We invested in GigE interfaces for one of our 5500's. Good investment
at that. It's needed for migrating to a 6500... ;-)
>>> "MADMAN" 07/10/02 07:25AM >>>
If you go with the 4000 the supIII is going to give you much more
performance, forwarding 48Mpps as opposed to 18 with the supI and II
an
Well, part of it is Layer 10 (politics). Although I have yet to hear/read
about a end device (Server/PC/printer) that can actually handle a full
1Gbps, part of the way this radiology system works is that images are
transferred from a centralized storage facility to a local server, then the
client
Assuming the computers are Intel & Microsoft based, there's little chance,
IMHO, that you'll even over-subscribe 100M links for each device. Going Gig
should be no problem. If you go with the 4006, check out this link,
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/lnty/etty/ggetty/prodlit/1092_pp.
ht
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:28 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]
>
>
>We currently have 4006's SupII in our closets and they have no trouble
>handling the traffic (240 ports). If you want to go IOS you can move up to
>the Sup
Bill Pearch, Anchorage AK
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]
At 12:02 PM + 7/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Gig to the desktop would be o
8 matches
Mail list logo
