Just as a clarification to what you wrote and the terminology
that you used, how exactly are you defining a "Supernet,"
particularly on this network?
v/r,
Paul Werner
> I could be wrong here, but I would imagine the reason this
works is that
> you
> have a supernet there, with the mask of 25
Great point. It's not a supernet of anything. Not with the first octet
being 24.
Thomas Larus
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Werner"
To: ; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: quick response (help) pleas
MAIL PROTECTED]"
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Subject: Re: quick response (help)
please [7:24238]
>
>
> > Just as a clarification to what you wrote and
the terminology
> > that you used, how exactly are you defining
a "Supernet,"
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Subject: Re: quick response (help)
please [7:24238]
>
>
> > Just as a clarification to what you wrote and
the terminology
> > that you used, how exactly are you defining
a "Supernet
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Paul Werner
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Subject: Re: quick response (help) please [7:24238]
>
>
> Agreed. While it is possible to supernet cl
It says 09/12/2001 as the last update.
>>> "Chuck Larrieu" 10/27/01 08:02PM >>>
[snip]
BTW, looking over the allocation table at:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
interesting. anyone know how up to date this is?
Chuck
[snip]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/f
ROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
> Paul Werner
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Subject: Re: quick response (help) please
[7:24238]
>
>
> Agreed. While it is possible to supernet class A
> addresses, it is generally impractic
7 matches
Mail list logo
